Submitted by RadioFreeAmerika t3_122ilav in singularity
RadioFreeAmerika OP t1_jdrayae wrote
Reply to comment by Personal_Problems_99 in Why is maths so hard for LLMs? by RadioFreeAmerika
I am always friendly to it. But your results would support the theory that it is better at "two+two" than "2+2".
Personal_Problems_99 t1_jdrb838 wrote
Could you please add the numbers 450+220?
Yes, of course! The sum of 450 and 220 is 670.
Personal_Problems_99 t1_jdrbep5 wrote
Yes, I can multiply 321 and 25 for you.
When you multiply 321 by 25, you can use the standard long multiplication method as follows:
markdownCopy code
321 x 25 ----- 1605 (5 x 321) + 6420 (2 x 321 with a zero added) ----- 8025
Therefore, 321 multiplied by 25 equals 8025
RadioFreeAmerika OP t1_jdrcxqw wrote
From which LLM is this? Maybe it got improved in the last few days. A few days ago, similar queries didn't work for me with ChatGPT and Bing.
Personal_Problems_99 t1_jdrd826 wrote
I use ChatGPT and now sometimes bard. I haven't messed with bing lately because it's a bit sluggish.
Don't let bard fool you, it knows the truth but it's a liar. I haven't worked out how to get it to quit lying to you yet.
But chatgpt.... To me it seems alive.
RadioFreeAmerika OP t1_jdrfevx wrote
They named it Bard. What did you expect ;-)
Do you have access to GPT-4? I only played around with the public version on OpenAi and when prompted it didn't even know about GPT-4, specifically.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments