WingsofmyLove t1_jdkbb0q wrote on March 25, 2023 at 12:32 AM

Reply to comment by vivehelpme in Artificial Intelligence Predicts Genetics of Cancerous Brain Tumors in Under 90 Seconds by JackFisherBooks

"you still need humans in the loop if you want to see advancements" Would AI researchers not be the ones making the advancements? I assume physical robots would get to the point where they can operate without an operator 24/7

vivehelpme t1_jdlnk0a wrote on March 25, 2023 at 8:58 AM

The AI researcher can improve the AI system. As in make chatgpt run on a 2015 version smartwatch.

But that will not add novel chemotherapy regiments to the clinical practice of the healthbot.

Humans are constantly learning and observing. The AI systems we use today generalize based on a gathered dataset. Teach an AI what is right today but wrong tomorrow and it will keep being wrong until fine tuned again. There are degrees of flexibility and innovation we still haven't captured with AI

econpol t1_jdke1gj wrote on March 25, 2023 at 12:52 AM

I think it'll be hard to have AI researchers. Problem solving it even just identifying a problem space is difficult to turn into an algorithm, especially the more fundamental you go in your approach. Human creativity still likely still be essential for a long time.

WingsofmyLove t1_jdkf1k5 wrote on March 25, 2023 at 1:00 AM

Human creativity can be replicated by AI considering its just the result of environmental factors and human experiences

vivehelpme t1_jdlntku wrote on March 25, 2023 at 9:02 AM

It's all just computation, that's the century old original hypothesis of AI.

But until we actually see universally generalized human traits in what we build we're not there.