1II1I11II1I1I111I1 t1_jdtncfb wrote
Reply to comment by ArcticWinterZzZ in AI being run locally got me thinking, if an event happened that would knock out the internet, we'd still have the internet's wealth of knowledge in our access. by Anjz
GPT-4 is far, far smarter than Wikipedia.
ArcticWinterZzZ t1_jdtps8v wrote
Of course. Wikipedia cannot think. But what I mean is that if you just want to preserve information, you should preserve an archive and not an AI that can sometimes hallucinate information.
1II1I11II1I1I111I1 t1_jdtpyeu wrote
Wikipedia is 1% the archive that GPT-4 is though. Hallucinations will likely be solved soon according to Ilya Sutskever, keep up!
Cryptizard t1_jdur2sy wrote
This is completely wrong. Wikipedia has a lot more in depth information than GPT does. Try asking GPT about obscure facts some time.
1II1I11II1I1I111I1 t1_jdur9s4 wrote
Give me 3 facts and I'll ask GPT4 to check them now
Cryptizard t1_jduumtg wrote
I have access to GPT4, I’m not making this stuff up. Here are three from poking around, but keep in mind it will pretend to know the answer to anything it is just wrong when you ask it to explain the details. It will not match with actual fact, I.e. what is in Wikipedia.
What is an oblivious tree?
What is the population of Goleh-ye Cheshmeh?
Where was the 65th governor of Delaware born?
CancerPiss t1_jdujefs wrote
GPT cannot think either
daou0782 t1_jduxcxr wrote
What is thinking? Do submarines swim?
CancerPiss t1_jduxuwl wrote
Is my microwave thinking? I mean, I click a few buttons and it starts doins things
Ambiwlans t1_jdvjxkg wrote
While the GPT authors would agree with you, reddit knows better! GPT clearly thinks and has a soul and is basically agi!
CancerPiss t1_jdvlcz1 wrote
That's why you need to stay BASED😩 when dealing with redditors
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments