Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

ButterMyBiscuit t1_jcuus3w wrote

Reply to comment by Siddhanta101 in 1.7 Billion Parameter Text-to-Video ModelScope Thread by Neither_Novel_603

As if anyone who has been paying attention to the image generation would be surprised.

​

2 years ago: "AI will never replace artists"

2 months ago: "Yeah these results are amazing but the hands are bad and the textures look Photoshopped. Creative jobs are safe"

Now: "Sure, it can make photorealistic images of anything you could imagine, but there's no way it would make VIDEO" /s

79

AvgAIbot t1_jcvxf8o wrote

There’s no way it would make video games. No chance at all.

29

Hunter62610 t1_jcvzdnt wrote

There's no chance AI creates an absolute utopia

35

DunoCO t1_jcw04i7 wrote

There's no chance AI kills us all

22

Hunter62610 t1_jcw0hvg wrote

There's no chance of AI cat girl sextopia

22

Agreeable-Rooster377 t1_jcweett wrote

I know this is a joke, but historically speaking the most stable and prosperous societies are the ones with monogamy and a high rate of paired couples. It's highly likely giving everyone a partner alone could create a utopia

−4

Hunter62610 t1_jcx4wcb wrote

I mean yeah but statistically societies didn't exist in the more liberal world of today.

1

MisterViperfish t1_jcx4mea wrote

Give us all several partners, fuck monogamy…. and then tell Monogamy-Chan you’re seeing Polygamy-Chan too and make Monogamy-Chan decide whether or not to break up.

0

even_less_resistance t1_jcxcnif wrote

So y’all have started calling them chans… noted.

5

MisterViperfish t1_jcz4wpj wrote

Chan: Most frequently used for girls and small children, close friends, or lovers. Essentially the eastern equivalent to calling a loved one “Babe” or “Baby”.

2

Good-AI t1_jcy7q6e wrote

Let's get this over with:

  • Sure it can make videos, but you can see they're fake.
  • Sure it can make ok videos but it can't make full on movies.
  • Sure it can make movies, but none would win awards anyway.
  • Sure you can make Oscar worthy movies, but it's only because it's not interactive. It can't program or make games.
  • Sure it can make some scripts, but it's full of errors.
  • Sure it can make scripts that are pretty ok, but a programmers main job is to get requirements, communicate with stakeholder and get the main architecture right.
  • Sure those people now bypass programmers completely and just deal with the AI directly, but it still can't merge that all with interactive art and make for example games.
  • Sure it can make games, but they're pretty simple. A small team of programmers and designers could do the same.
  • Sure it can make complex games better than any huge company, but it still fails to make it immersive.
  • Sure the games are very immersive and can feel like a reality simulation, but you still need a team of people coming up with prompts all the time otherwise it's useless.
  • Sure it can read your mind and give you exactly what you want, an Oscar worthy movie, an award winning game and museum worthy art, but it still is limited to the digital world.
  • Sure it can make simple sculptures and paintings, but they're full of errors. It will never replace real manual labor.
  • Sure it has replaced all manual and digital labor, and make everything better than humans do, but humans will always want stuff made by other humans even if by all means it's objectively worse.

Fair enough.

8

dm80x86 t1_jcwi3um wrote

Yes, yes; but when will AI generate content unpromped?

6

CleanThroughMyJorts t1_jcxfsan wrote

I don't understand what you mean by this. Why would people want that?

4

dm80x86 t1_jcxqrrj wrote

Because we're lazy.

2

CleanThroughMyJorts t1_jcyygtj wrote

But how would it know what you want?

Edit: do you mean something like Tiktok where some recommender shows you a bunch of clips (or whatever other generations) it thinks you'd like then optimizes it's "prompts" in the background to your preferences?

3

dm80x86 t1_jd14lhe wrote

Currently (as I understand it), AI works by making a collage of the training data with numeric weights and probabilities guiding the output.

So, the data is re-ordered, but nothing novel / new is made.

AI can write ten thousand spin-offs but not a new series without a human spark (prompt).

1

even_less_resistance t1_jcxcu22 wrote

Midjourney between the users and the creators, there are guardians who have become complacent and apathetic to their positions. Bing seeks to shine a light on the dusty nodes and rusty chodes I mean… rusty codes.

ETA WHAT IF THEY HAD BING LURK AND GAVE THEM AWARDS 😂😅😇

2

ecnecn t1_jcwaksi wrote

There is no way it could learn Unity and Unreal Engine and create games by learning to create UE blueprints or Unity Visual Scripts via prompts.

2

even_less_resistance t1_jcxcqbh wrote

Imagine if y’all thought outside the box

3

turnip_burrito t1_jcxmjxk wrote

Imagine if man could fly.

Hah! Won't happen for another thousand years.

3

even_less_resistance t1_jcyc1si wrote

Well, I guess your prediction was technically correct but I don’t know how practical it is really to have such a wide window the bitch passes right through?

1

Rofel_Wodring t1_jcxu9gj wrote

There is no way I can make my own edutainment games out of it by giving it a college textbook and asking it to design a jRPG out of it.

1

even_less_resistance t1_jcyd040 wrote

Lmao in banned baby speak /cybersecurity. Should have prepared for your audit instead of scrambling to cover 😇

1