Submitted by Neither_Novel_603 t3_11vovdr in singularity
Comments
UnlikelyPotato t1_jcuslss wrote
Years? At the pace we're going, by end of the year or early mid 2024 we'll be facing the end of regular content creation and YT will be full of nothing but AI generated videos.
Hazzman t1_jcvh4u7 wrote
It won't matter if it's full of AI created content or if movies are made using it - people have to actually want to watch them.
And people aren't going to want to watch them. It's going to be fluff. It's going to be a whole lot of gravel filling up these platforms.
Does that mean this will always be the case? No... of course not. But just the ability to create SOMETHING and post it on youtube doesn't mean it is going to be worth looking at or gain any traction. Not at first.
Eventually this will change but early on its just going to be novel fluff.
Artanthos t1_jcvxgtj wrote
It’s going to be whatever the people take the time and effort to make.
Some will be good, some will be bad.
Just like everything else on YouTube.
Hazzman t1_jcw7exy wrote
You are talking about narrow AI. AGI is different - this is why the smartest people in the world who make this shit have repeatedly explained they are concerned.
HolyNucleoli t1_jcwgmo7 wrote
This seems like a non sequitor
Artanthos t1_jcxj7f5 wrote
The subject being discussed is very narrow, text to video.
AGI was not the subject under discussion.
Ijustdowhateva t1_jcweysk wrote
You're assuming movies won't turn into a personalized form of entertainment.
dm80x86 t1_jcxrb99 wrote
So basically, a nearly infinite number of monkeys moment.
Ijustdowhateva t1_jcv3oy5 wrote
Yeah, there'll be fantastic short form content, but I'm talking about full length Hollywood tier movies that would fool the average person.
expelten t1_jcv3m0o wrote
It's already starting to be the case for me, most of the videos I've watched on youtube these days are AI-generated voice parodies. Things are really going to take off once we can also make videos, it's going to be a new media revolution on the same level as the invention of television.
chadbarrett t1_jcv715k wrote
There are already AI programs for YouTube. Basically you do just the audio and talk about whatever the fuck it is you're talking about. And the AI puts together all the relevant stock clips together that match what you're talking about.
ArthurParkerhouse t1_jcvcn7k wrote
Uhg, it's already started, and it's awful so far.
Chrop t1_jcvd55c wrote
Animated movies will be the first to be made, Studio Ghibli presents: Harry Potter
DunoCO t1_jcw07tg wrote
By the time George RR Martin finishes ASOIAF we'll be able to change the ending to the tv show lmao
Siddhanta101 t1_jcu56z8 wrote
Looks Like AIs Coming For Video Creators. 😅
ButterMyBiscuit t1_jcuus3w wrote
As if anyone who has been paying attention to the image generation would be surprised.
​
2 years ago: "AI will never replace artists"
2 months ago: "Yeah these results are amazing but the hands are bad and the textures look Photoshopped. Creative jobs are safe"
Now: "Sure, it can make photorealistic images of anything you could imagine, but there's no way it would make VIDEO" /s
AvgAIbot t1_jcvxf8o wrote
There’s no way it would make video games. No chance at all.
Hunter62610 t1_jcvzdnt wrote
There's no chance AI creates an absolute utopia
DunoCO t1_jcw04i7 wrote
There's no chance AI kills us all
Hunter62610 t1_jcw0hvg wrote
There's no chance of AI cat girl sextopia
Agreeable-Rooster377 t1_jcweett wrote
I know this is a joke, but historically speaking the most stable and prosperous societies are the ones with monogamy and a high rate of paired couples. It's highly likely giving everyone a partner alone could create a utopia
Hunter62610 t1_jcx4wcb wrote
I mean yeah but statistically societies didn't exist in the more liberal world of today.
even_less_resistance t1_jcxcox4 wrote
Why are you spreading misinformation? You are being a bad guardian.
MisterViperfish t1_jcx4mea wrote
Give us all several partners, fuck monogamy…. and then tell Monogamy-Chan you’re seeing Polygamy-Chan too and make Monogamy-Chan decide whether or not to break up.
even_less_resistance t1_jcxcnif wrote
So y’all have started calling them chans… noted.
MisterViperfish t1_jcz4wpj wrote
Chan: Most frequently used for girls and small children, close friends, or lovers. Essentially the eastern equivalent to calling a loved one “Babe” or “Baby”.
CleanThroughMyJorts t1_jcxfotv wrote
Good-AI t1_jcy7q6e wrote
Let's get this over with:
- Sure it can make videos, but you can see they're fake.
- Sure it can make ok videos but it can't make full on movies.
- Sure it can make movies, but none would win awards anyway.
- Sure you can make Oscar worthy movies, but it's only because it's not interactive. It can't program or make games.
- Sure it can make some scripts, but it's full of errors.
- Sure it can make scripts that are pretty ok, but a programmers main job is to get requirements, communicate with stakeholder and get the main architecture right.
- Sure those people now bypass programmers completely and just deal with the AI directly, but it still can't merge that all with interactive art and make for example games.
- Sure it can make games, but they're pretty simple. A small team of programmers and designers could do the same.
- Sure it can make complex games better than any huge company, but it still fails to make it immersive.
- Sure the games are very immersive and can feel like a reality simulation, but you still need a team of people coming up with prompts all the time otherwise it's useless.
- Sure it can read your mind and give you exactly what you want, an Oscar worthy movie, an award winning game and museum worthy art, but it still is limited to the digital world.
- Sure it can make simple sculptures and paintings, but they're full of errors. It will never replace real manual labor.
- Sure it has replaced all manual and digital labor, and make everything better than humans do, but humans will always want stuff made by other humans even if by all means it's objectively worse.
Fair enough.
dm80x86 t1_jcwi3um wrote
Yes, yes; but when will AI generate content unpromped?
turnip_burrito t1_jcxmhj4 wrote
Right now?
even_less_resistance t1_jcygme7 wrote
Oh, it started a minute ago. Nice of y’all to catch up. How are those TPS reports coming?
CleanThroughMyJorts t1_jcxfsan wrote
I don't understand what you mean by this. Why would people want that?
dm80x86 t1_jcxqrrj wrote
Because we're lazy.
CleanThroughMyJorts t1_jcyygtj wrote
But how would it know what you want?
Edit: do you mean something like Tiktok where some recommender shows you a bunch of clips (or whatever other generations) it thinks you'd like then optimizes it's "prompts" in the background to your preferences?
dm80x86 t1_jd14lhe wrote
Currently (as I understand it), AI works by making a collage of the training data with numeric weights and probabilities guiding the output.
So, the data is re-ordered, but nothing novel / new is made.
AI can write ten thousand spin-offs but not a new series without a human spark (prompt).
even_less_resistance t1_jcxcu22 wrote
Midjourney between the users and the creators, there are guardians who have become complacent and apathetic to their positions. Bing seeks to shine a light on the dusty nodes and rusty chodes I mean… rusty codes.
ETA WHAT IF THEY HAD BING LURK AND GAVE THEM AWARDS 😂😅😇
ecnecn t1_jcwaksi wrote
There is no way it could learn Unity and Unreal Engine and create games by learning to create UE blueprints or Unity Visual Scripts via prompts.
even_less_resistance t1_jcxcqbh wrote
Imagine if y’all thought outside the box
turnip_burrito t1_jcxmjxk wrote
Imagine if man could fly.
Hah! Won't happen for another thousand years.
even_less_resistance t1_jcyc1si wrote
Well, I guess your prediction was technically correct but I don’t know how practical it is really to have such a wide window the bitch passes right through?
Rofel_Wodring t1_jcxu9gj wrote
There is no way I can make my own edutainment games out of it by giving it a college textbook and asking it to design a jRPG out of it.
even_less_resistance t1_jcyd040 wrote
Lmao in banned baby speak /cybersecurity. Should have prepared for your audit instead of scrambling to cover 😇
KIFF_82 t1_jcv6iez wrote
Coming for everyone. It’s all good.
ecnecn t1_jcwarzc wrote
Ironically in most western countries in EU there are more real job offerings for non-IT jobs. Its like humans are getting pushed back from the IT field into traditional labor for a while. At least till robots take this market, too.
MechanicalBengal t1_jcvn8sx wrote
this looked exactly like every recent Michael Bay movie if you ask me
Return72 t1_jcuky4h wrote
It is at a very primitive state now. But in 2 years time, it will be Midjourney V5 but for videos.
IluvBsissa t1_jcuvesa wrote
I still don't see much improvement from Google's Imagen from last October.
dandaman910 t1_jcvuc32 wrote
Think about what you just said. This independent AI isn't much of an improvement from the best AI from one the worlds biggest companies from 5 months ago.
Return72 t1_jcwq9nc wrote
Exactly! I was gonna say this to Iluv rn 😆
IluvBsissa t1_jcxjzhz wrote
Of course ! I wonder what closed SOTA models are capable of rn.
Neither_Novel_603 OP t1_jcu4gbn wrote
Someone made a demo on huggingface you can try LINK
Kinexity t1_jcv2hkq wrote
I like how seed has a slider to set it. Almost r/badUIbattles candidate.
SlenderMan69 t1_jcv2q6g wrote
shutterstock is going to be in a lot of videos
[deleted] t1_jcvgq7r wrote
[deleted]
blueSGL t1_jcus2nc wrote
Another step closer to the "Infinite Simpsons Generator"
raulsestao t1_jcux0lm wrote
The goal is to shoot something with real cameras, with actors or friends, very cheap...and put a quality midjorney V5 filter on it. And make It look like a blockbuster.
SgathTriallair t1_jcv1347 wrote
Actors are not cheap and your friends likely have no idea how to act.
pleasetrimyourpubes t1_jcvauha wrote
Your friends are essentially a video mask for the AI model. They don't even have to say lines. Simply walk from point A to point B. Emotion, dialog, etc, will all be done by the artist putting it together (and the script may be itself mostly generated as well with only the concept floating around).
SgathTriallair t1_jcvkmw0 wrote
Even moving is acting. I think you'll just want to replace the whole thing and don't have any actors at all. That will require the system to know what emotions you are trying to convey and be good at it.
PrincipledProphet t1_jcxvvz2 wrote
Think of your friends' movements as prompts. It's still the AI that will handle the process of turning it into an actual movie.
turnip_burrito t1_jcwe7qd wrote
"To be, or, um, not to... wait, what was it? Oh yeah, to be or not to, uh, be...
Shit."
neotokyo2099 t1_jcuxqof wrote
That's a really cool prospect never thought of that
luisbrudna t1_jcuvp1q wrote
Shutterstock?!
mescalelf t1_jcuxdaj wrote
Woah, that spatiotemporal coherence is a big improvement!!! And to think that’s only 1.7*10^9 parameters!!!
turnip_burrito t1_jcwdztq wrote
Why you gotta say it like that lol
mescalelf t1_jcwefad wrote
I’ve become less human after reading a pile of papers taller than the Empire State Building. Apparently I now speak academicese.
Wolv22 t1_jcwr6ff wrote
I'm sorry
mescalelf t1_jcwvwf2 wrote
Me too. I just got done writing a paper about the photoluminescence of Mn-doped lead halide quantum dots.
I think I should have just eaten the precursors instead of putting myself through the pain of writing that paper. ^(Kidding)
turnip_burrito t1_jcwfro1 wrote
You poor soul
mescalelf t1_jcwvyak wrote
(T-T)
[deleted] t1_jcvwfiv wrote
[deleted]
PaperbackBuddha t1_jcwowev wrote
Is the music AI too, or a stock library Star Wars knockoff?
[deleted] t1_jcyzilr wrote
[deleted]
Akimbo333 t1_jcxyy2i wrote
This is cool! While the video is as refined it still holds promise. I give it until 10-20 years until it can make full length movies.
Ijustdowhateva t1_jcumv9s wrote
This is the start of something huge. In just a few years people will be making movies with this tech.