Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

ThatInternetGuy t1_jckmq5s wrote

>HF-RLHF

Probably no need, since this model could piggyback on the responses generated from GPT4, so it should carry the trait of the GPT4 model with RLHF, shouldn't it?

3

CellWithoutCulture t1_jcmsxjq wrote

HF-RLHF is the name of the dataset. As far as RLHF... what they did to LLaMA is called "Knowledge Distillation" and iirc usually isn't quite as good as RLHF. It's an approximation.

3