Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

AllNinjas t1_ir99vnz wrote

From the article’s last paragraph: “In this New Computer Science — if we even call it Computer Science at all — the machines will be so powerful and already know how to do so many things that the field will look like less of an engineering endeavor and more of an an educational one; that is, how to best educate the machine, not unlike the science of how to best educate children in school. Unlike (human) children, though, these AI systems will be flying our airplanes, running our power grids, and possibly even governing entire countries. I would argue that the vast majority of Classical CS becomes irrelevant when our focus turns to teaching intelligent machines rather than directly programming them. Programming, in the conventional sense, will in fact be dead.”

Imo it will become more important as more of these big companies while will be taking models and other artificial programs from others the ones who can write completely from scratch regardless of previous template will be in high demand.

The need to know how an os runs/operates will still forever be a thing. Might be a few steps below need to know life skills like swimming in my opinion.

3

Deformero t1_ir9c7zb wrote

Yeah, it sounds great and looks like it might be true, but it also might never happen as it sure collides with a lot of interests in several (if not all) fields.

I mean, what if Google (for now it seems that they are the only one with data and resources to make something as advanced) keeps it for themselves and give average user just crumbs of advanced AI functionalities as some subscription plan. Their AI model is their AI model.

6

Whattaboutthecosmos t1_iraj8et wrote

After reading this, a thought popped into my head; Although there is certainly a disparity in the data/intelligence google has vs the person in the basement, the person in the basement still has a lot of potential with only the information that is available free online. Even if this disparity always exists, the person in the basement will also still be able to progress their data/intelligence as time goes on exponentially just as google is able to.

4

Deformero t1_iram2jr wrote

Sure, you can get bunch of books and all kinds of expert literature for free or very cheap, but average person in the basment will not read that and work on himself. Average Internet consumer watches YouTube, Netflix and porn.

2

Whattaboutthecosmos t1_irapd7i wrote

Yes, I presume you are correct. Though, any person with a computer and internet now has access. This includes above average people (however you wish to define above-average). Also, an average person may partake in the activities you listed on 99% of the days of their lives. But they may find a few days in their life to produce something worthwhile. This could be something as big as defying mortality or writing a meaningful blog post that could be accessed by millions and nudge discourse in a new direction. Even deciding to upvote or downvote something could have a micro-impact.

side-note: (*This is just free thinking) I find it interesting that you call them "internet consumer"s, as I see interacting with the internet as a sort of communication. A user that is going to sites such as youtube, netflix, etc. is still communicating with the internet by giving prompts to go to those sites. I couldn't consume the internet the same way I couldn't consume a person just by interacting with them.

2