Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

thisisnotsquidward t1_isp72ai wrote

I sometimes wonder, is this the correct path to sentience! The AI in stead of talking about its experience tries to emulate human vision. Like, it obviously cannot smell, yet it says that.

2

StringNut t1_ispbvwq wrote

you want a functional Id, Ego, Superego system of feedback and influence, not just a statistical model of outcomes.

2

tooold4urcrap t1_ispf0tv wrote

I don't think it's a 'correct path to sentience'. It's a small step in teaching the system how to speak to/with us, and to do it how we naturally speak. When we watch Sci-fi shows, people just randomly speak to the computer - and it's done so in such a natural way, that the computer can tell in the midst of conversation when it's being prompted. This is a part of that. This isn't the path to sentience, this is the path to natural communication technology - which will absolutely be used in all AI.

2