Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Future_Believer t1_ispgqs6 wrote

Interesting. If you asked me to imagine something, I would struggle to visualize something that has never(to the best of my knowledge) existed. I would draw on my several decades of reading, traveling, watching videos, conversing with others and dreams to complete the task. What I came up with might be an amalgamation of things experienced or might be just one where the image stuck with me but the source did not. The fact that the Manufactured Intelligence was able to do all of that on demand is not a disqualifier in my view.

For now it looks to be of fairly limited utility but that limitation may well be mine(yours). I suppose the programming language for MIs in the near future will consist of nothing more than asking the right question.

1

raccoon8182 t1_isrlzx7 wrote

That's very sad. Any kid could imagine anything with limited to access to human history.

1

Future_Believer t1_isrpxub wrote

I can imagine plenty but it is all rooted in or based on things that I have experienced in some way. I can't imagine certain aspects of quantum physics - especially not well enough to draw them. I can't imagine jellyfish respiration. I can't imagine the chemical structure of Brazil nuts.

I have plenty of imagination. I have written in the past about imagination and I find it interesting that a Manufactured Intelligence is currently able to pretend to have an imagination that well.

Unless I have missed your point, there is nothing to be sad about.

2

raccoon8182 t1_isrztl2 wrote

I think we have two different concepts of imagination. Yours is rooted in logic "I can't imagine the chemical structure" I can, it's purple with green balls, that turn into Orange brilings. What's a briling? Use your imagination. When a kid draws a machine that's never been invented in physics that don't work, out when authors dream of impossible worlds, none of that needs reference, it just needs lots of explanation.

You're right though, imagination is good evidence for conscience. I'd go as far as to say only humans have imagination. So it's certainly not a trivial topic.

0

Future_Believer t1_istpgtl wrote

Not to be argumentative for the sake of being argumentative but, my mere inability to state specifically where I saw or experienced something, or even just the seed of something, doesn't mean I absolutely never saw or experienced it.

Let's say you are hiking in the wilds and you come upon an actual version of the old movie trope - a human child raised by wolves with no other human contact from early on in its infancy. As an experiment you ask that child and 100 others of the same age but that had been raised in any of the global cultures with access to internet and movies, to imagine something that in theory, none of them had ever seen or experienced. I would expect the wolf-child to present significantly different answers than the more traditionally raised children. I would expect there to be some level of similarity - however faint - amongst the answers from the traditionally raised children.

It sounds to me like you are saying that my expectations would not be met. That all of the children would come up with equally irrelevant and inexplicable concepts. If so, that would change my thinking. OTOH, if there was an element of similarity, however slight, among the traditionally raised children but not the wolf-child, would that not suggest at least a common seed of an experience or exposure?

I don't think imagination lives in a vacuum. The connections may be tenuous but I suspect there are some there. I have no idea how one might practicably test my theory.

2

raccoon8182 t1_isuegoy wrote

Totally hear you and agree, however the question arises as to what is imagination. Is it random memory fused together to create something new, or some sort of emotion/ego algorithm. In any event, why do the synapses fire in such a way to use those 'specific' memories. Is imagination a choice? And if it is, what is it governed by. In a computer there is no imagination, because there is no algorithm. There is data. If I made a simple query to grab random data and present it to you, would that be imagination?

It's out of my scope on either front, but it feels like the machine needs more self-awareness to truthfully present imagination.

1