Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

roundearthervaxxer t1_it13lj5 wrote

Reply to comment by kmtrp in Talked to people minimizing/negating potential AI impact in their field? eg: artists, coders... by kmtrp

ok. I will watch out for that "rude awakening." Thanks for your wise counsel.

When you can take an innovative piece of concept art off of Artstation and reproduce it faithfully, you are getting closer. We are really not there for that right now. For concept art for movies and special effects, we need much tighter control.

Also, mixing a bunch of art styles is not at all the same as innovating. Art defies imitation. That is what art is.

We will probably get there. I don't see this as certain.

...waiting for those amazing mech designs.

1

kmtrp OP t1_it4if8n wrote

Right now today no, we don't have human level digital artists where you can converse with it and it does what you want step by step, but we are very close as in less than a year close. Check this, which is for coding, now think of that approach with the art engines we have today, much less tomorrow.

You not only have to look at present and add the current rate of improvement, the current rate of improvement will be demolished by tomorrow. Essentially this. People have a hard time understanding exponential growth, hence the disconnect between the two groups of people.

​

>Art defies imitation. That is what art is.

This is such anthropomorphic delusional bullshit I'm speechless. That's just, wouldn't even know where to begin.

0