NefariousNaz t1_it0k0so wrote on October 20, 2022 at 1:27 AM

Reply to comment by [deleted] in New research suggests our brains use quantum computation by Dr_Singularity

They're not more likely interpretations.

A lot of scientists feel like the many worlds interpretation is the most likely interpretation just following the data.

It doesn't sound like you're that well versed on the subject.

-ZeroRelevance- t1_it1400g wrote on October 20, 2022 at 4:10 AM

Yeah, there’s no ‘more likely’ interpretation, because we literally have no evidence for anything just yet. It could be Many Worlds, it could be Copenhagen, it could be Superdeterminism. As it stands, we have no way to know.

Shelfrock77 t1_it1alc3 wrote on October 20, 2022 at 5:20 AM

What if it’s all truth even when there are clear contrast. This is how we change/reprogram our thoughts.

NefariousNaz t1_it2fisn wrote on October 20, 2022 at 1:27 PM

Wait until he realize that the main competing interpretations are that particles exist in a superposition state until 'looked' at - See Schrondinger's cat for the implications which is both alive and dead until looked at - or that every interaction has already been pre-determined and time is an illusion.