civilrunner t1_iuw04zp wrote
Reply to comment by helliun in Scientists Create Glow In The Dark Plants That Could Replace Streetlights In The Future by sopadebombillas
We literally just have to put shades over the top of lights to direct it down towards the street and prevent it from going elsewhere.
helliun t1_iuw0s0y wrote
yeah that makes sense it's definitely weird that they don't already do that. but per my first question is there no application that you could think of for this? I'm willing to accept if there's not but I just feel like there could be
kala-umba t1_iuwbh32 wrote
Parties and Ambiente light
civilrunner t1_iuw0v0e wrote
It's pretty simple. It costs money to add a shade, they don't have the budget for it so they don't.
helliun t1_iuw10la wrote
i meant any applications for the plants mb that wasn't clear
civilrunner t1_iuw16fm wrote
No idea. Releasing a bunch of engineered plants that I assume would reproduce and spread may also not be the best idea.
SWATSgradyBABY t1_iuw6szd wrote
It's not that at all. They don't care about light pollution. Also, they are crazy obsessed with the spectre of crime. So the more light, the better.
civilrunner t1_iuw9mpw wrote
I mean they do care about light pollution, and you could have all the street lighting you want without light pollution if you just prevent the light from going up. Good lighting prevents crime and improves safety.
But when it comes to anything cities have to weigh budget priorities and shading the top of light posts just doesn't have the priority as other things.
SWATSgradyBABY t1_iuwax1h wrote
Where is the evidence that they're concerned with light pollution? I'm concerned. You seem to be. I wish they were.
civilrunner t1_iuwbooe wrote
It's something pretty commonly discussed. There just isn't the budget for the solution most of the time. Money and production drives everything and causes people to need to make trade offs and prioritize things. If they had all the money and production imaginable then they wouldn't have to pick trade offs but sadly we do.
SWATSgradyBABY t1_iuwcq4l wrote
We have these organizations called NPUs, neighborhood planning units. I've been attending various ones for 2 decades now. I see the budgets and understand the tradeoffs. Residents don't want em more than they want plenty of other nonsense.
nblack88 t1_iuwvvpf wrote
Residents DON'T want them? That surprises me. Can you give insight as to why?
I'm a big fan of Dark Sky friendly lighting, and donate to the International Dark Sky Association (IDA) sometimes. Every resident I've spoken to who experienced the transition has enjoyed the new lighting, provided it's implemented well.
blueSGL t1_iux9hew wrote
it'd be infrastructure costs. If you can get lights that direct light correctly but are not slot in replacements and need to replace/retofit the attachments/poles they will not get used as they cost more money.
and the above holds true if there are slot in replacements but they cost more money.
The solution needs to be cheap and easy to implement otherwise it will face massive barriers to being done.
Nirriti_the_Black t1_iuwus5w wrote
Bathroom nightlight.
archpawn t1_iuypump wrote
It reflects when it hits the ground, which is how it helps us see.
What I have seen done is using sodium lamps which emit a very specific frequency of yellow, so it's easy to filter out.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments