I assume, you are just trying to push your politics down into everyone's throat. There are most likely going to be people having energy and other ressources. Also, technology isn't obligated to solve political problems. It might solve it, or maybe it doesn't. Maybe the coming crisis will solve the problems by removing some elites, and not necessarily "the billionaires". People might even not agree, that there is a political problem. Just because you claim there's something to solve, doesn't mean everyone has to agree, or agree with the way you want to solve it.

We have enough for everyone and poverty

• and we share
• or we don't

We don't have enough for everyone plus technology

• and we share
• or we don't

We have enough for everyone plus technology

• and we share
• or we don't

It's a political decision, and it's futile to discuss these theoretical scenarios with hostile actors.