OldWorldRevival OP t1_j0msct1 wrote on December 17, 2022 at 9:21 PM

Reply to comment by Fluffykins298 in Why are people so opposed to caution and ethics when it comes to AI? by OldWorldRevival

I am actually not against AI at all - in fact, I considered going into it at one time (and still might, especially because the danger seems to be growing and there are some philosophical technical talents I might be able to apply to a lot of specific AI problems).

> Criticism is great when its well founded and comes from genuine concern rather than people attacking the whole concept AI because it lacks a “soul” or is “stealing” their job

So... it's going to replace all of our jobs. The other thing we need to get ahead on is actually getting UBI pushed through.

I'd be willing to fear-monger to get UBI pushed, especially with the way that conservatives tend to act.

Fluffykins298 t1_j0mtjhw wrote on December 17, 2022 at 9:29 PM

So then and correct me if I’m missing your point but your not against AI just using it as a scare tactic to push people towards implementing a universal basic income?

AndromedaAnimated t1_j0na15h wrote on December 17, 2022 at 11:30 PM

He has a problem where he cannot distinguish philosophy from technology. Somehow dude even thinks he has relevant skills that AI research would need. Guess he is advertising for himself? He is pushing it as a scary tactic while thinking he might be the potential savior.

I mean, it’s ok, I can understand dude. It’s a legit approach when having a psychotic episode. I am even worse in mine, I keep thinking I have to call Elon Musk back about Neuralink, language and semantics processing and electroencephalography. Good I don’t have his number. But still. I dunno, OP is kinda not being nice here in this thread.