Comments
ReadSeparate t1_izhbplg wrote
Who is this person tweeting? Are they a physicist? If not, who cares, this could easily be random gibberish from the model.
LowLook t1_izhcjrr wrote
Maybe both are AI’s im so confused rn
fractal_engineer t1_izh5c9m wrote
it's parroting research papers
genericrich t1_izkbpw3 wrote
it's parroting literally everything it outputs. thats...what it does
fractal_engineer t1_izkc34u wrote
but mah sentience ?
genericrich t1_izkc7o1 wrote
The scary part is that this may very well be what our brains are doing too.
Stabile_Feldmaus t1_izhcs81 wrote
No it didn't.
TinyBurbz t1_izh6cc0 wrote
I swear to fucking god
ourtown2 t1_izhq7yo wrote
From ChatGPT
Web search results:
[1]. "Geodesics in general relativity. In general relativity, a geodesic generalizes the notion of a straight line to curved spacetime. Importantly, the world line of a particle free from all external, non-gravitational forces is a particular type of geodesic. In other words, a freely moving or falling particle always moves along a geodesic."
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geodesics_in_general_relativity
[2]. "Here are a few examples of such geodesics: A geodesic in effect defines the analog of a straight line in a graph or hypergraph, and by analogy with the way geodesics work in continuous spaces, we can use them to probe emergent geometry. One can see the same effect in sufficiently large graphs (although it can be obscured by regularities in ..."
Source: https://www.wolframphysics.org/technical-introduction/limiting-behavior-and-emergent-geometry/geodesics/
[3]. "Geodesics Equation. According to general theory of relativity, gravitation is not a force but a property of spacetime geometry. A test particle and light move in response to the geometry of the spacetime. Actually, curved spacetimes of general relativity are explored by reviewing the nature of the motion of freely falling particles and light ..."
Source: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/general-theory-of-relativity/geodesic/E847E7D6C233013A9B3CCC16C2F48F1A
[4]. "The first order formulation of gravity theory has recently been found to admit vacuum solutions that represent a two-sheeted four-geometry, resembling a spacetime-bridge. These exhibit degenerate tetrads at their core. An analysis of geodesics in such non-Einsteinian spacetimes is set up here. This elucidates the causal and completeness properties of the spacetime-bridge manifolds. The angle ..."
Source: https://www.arxiv-vanity.com/papers/1803.08618/
[5]. "A graph is a discrete set of nodes and connecting links. A hypergraph is a generalized graph, wherein every subset of the node set may be included as an edge, which is analogous to a (2-node) link ..." Source: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/253838308_Causal_Sets_Hypergraphs_and_Cosmology
[6]. "Causal sets are discrete structures consisting of points and causal links; they show great promise as the starting point for quantization of spacetime and general relativity. A graph is a discrete set of nodes and connecting links. A hypergraph is a generalized graph, wherein every subset of the node set may be included as an edge, which is"
Source: https://physics.mercer.edu/balduz/research/papers/APSapr2005talk.pdf
[7]. "Doing this creates additional connections and additional geodesics, eventually producing something like the hyperbolic space examples in 4.2. So what the equation says is that any such effect, which would lead to negative curvature, must be compensated by positive curvature in the background spacetime — just as general relativity suggests."
Source: https://www.wolframphysics.org/technical-introduction/potential-relation-to-physics/matter-energy-and-gravitation/
Current date: 12/8/2022
Instructions: Using the provided web search results, write a comprehensive reply to the given prompt. Make sure to cite results using [number] notation after the reference. If the provided search results refer to multiple subjects with the same name, write separate answers for each subject.
Prompt: how could the density of geodesics in a causal hypergraph and the curvature of spacetime be related
In general relativity, the curvature of spacetime is related to the density of geodesics in a causal hypergraph. In a curved spacetime, geodesics are the analog of straight lines, and they are defined as the path taken by a freely falling particle or light. The geodesics in a causal hypergraph can be used to probe the emergent geometry of the spacetime.
According to the research presented in [4], the causal and completeness properties of spacetime-bridge manifolds can be studied by analyzing geodesics in non-Einsteinian spacetimes. These spacetimes exhibit degenerate tetrads at their core and have a two-sheeted four-geometry, which is similar to a spacetime-bridge.
Furthermore, as described in [7], the equation for the density of geodesics in a causal hypergraph shows that any effects that would lead to negative curvature in the spacetime must be compensated by positive curvature. This is in line with the predictions of general relativity, which suggests that the curvature of spacetime is determined by the distribution of matter and energy.
Overall, the density of geodesics in a causal hypergraph is related to the curvature of spacetime in general relativity. The geodesics in a causal hypergraph can be used to study the emergent geometry of spacetime, and the equation for the density of geodesics can be used to predict the curvature of spacetime based on the distribution of matter and energy.
As a previous answer states ChatGPT is just regurgitating Wolfram Physics
ShowerGrapes t1_izh54na wrote
fuck twitter. anyone got a screenshot?
N8tedogg t1_izh2m4r wrote
Interesting
Cryptizard t1_izh2nvd wrote
It sounds very specialized and advanced.
jamesj t1_izhi0dg wrote
This sounds to me like Stephen Wolfram's use of causal hypergraphs to model physics.
Technical-Berry8471 t1_izhqrln wrote
ChatGPT doesn't solve problems in and of itself, it is better to think of it as a good interface to the information that is on the internet. Essentially ChatGPT is drawing on scientific papers available online, and providing a concise summary. Unfortunately, at this time it does not provide the source of the information it is providing which provides naive users the impression that it is originating solutions, rather than regurgitating information.
maskedpaki t1_izjsa5e wrote
its not connected to the internet so its not a good source of information on the internet at all. try asking it questions about recent events. it has no idea.
​
all it knows is whats inside its training data
No_Ask_994 t1_izi6ou2 wrote
Please, ask gpt-chat before tweeting those things...
[deleted] t1_iziey7o wrote
[deleted]
maskedpaki t1_izjrui9 wrote
i would be shocked if this was correct since i couldnt get chatgpt to solve 3 variable simultaneous equations
Technical-Berry8471 t1_izkw2t9 wrote
I should have clarified, its data set is drawn from the internet. A data set that has been filtered for a reasonably accurate response.
[deleted] t1_izh5dwv wrote
[deleted]
LowLook t1_izhce4e wrote
Sounds legit wow. Sounds like its based on Wolfram Physics? Their model has some similarities to this?
ChronoPsyche t1_izhhj4b wrote
The posts on this sub are becoming worse than clickbait tabloid news. I've about had it with people misunderstanding what chatGPT does and thinking it's some omniscient super intelligence.