Submitted by IamDonya t3_10ip96d in singularity
TinyBurbz t1_j5iht99 wrote
Reply to comment by IamDonya in Can humanity find purpose in a world where AI is more capable than humans? by IamDonya
>On IMDB, all of the highest ranked movies will have been made by AIs, the only human-made movies that rank high are the ones that everybody knows the director used AI-input to create anyway.
Ah yes, IMDB, the place where botfarms literally offer the service of 100 reviews for $5 can be trusted.
>On Spotify, the songs with the most listens will all have been composed by AI, none of the songs made by humans garner nearly as many plays.
Lmao really? "The most popular music" is all the same song anyway. Modern music could all be written by AI and it wouldnt change anything. It doesn't mean AI "surpassed" humans, as AI isn't even needed to to do this. It can be done with a SEED:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOlDewpCfZQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nuGt-ZG39cU
>The Nobel prizes continue to be awarded to humans, but everyone knows that the winners were helped by an AI that did the heavy lifting.
"AI did the heavy lifting" is like saying "the library did the heavy lifting" or "the college did the heavy lifting"
>Also, everyone knows that there were more important developments in the field in the last year but was not recognized with a prize because it was strictly AI, there was no human involved to give the prize to.
Source: Trust me.
>A woman going on a date is at first disappointed and saddened when she realizes that the dude she is having dinner with seems to just want to get out of there and return home to his sex-bot. But on second thought she is relieved. She realizes that she'd like nothing more than to get back home to her own bot as well. Not only has her bot never failed to please her sexually, the conversation with the bot is 10x more interesting than talking to this dude and the bot knows what emotional buttons to push too.
Source: /r/IncelThoughts
IamDonya OP t1_j5jzuq2 wrote
I'm quite sure at this point that you understand what I mean even if my examples weren't that great.
In your initial post you asserted that AIs will never surpass humans in what you called "subjectively meaningful tasks", citing their lack of i) will, ii) life and iii) ability to sense the world around them, as arguments.
I gave my argument for why I believe they may, which is that I think our brains can be perfectly modeled as computing machines.
Ultimately I hope you're right, that would make humans truly special. I replied in the hope of hearing more about your thoughts and arguments for your position.
Seeing how you fail to give any arguments to support your point and instead have resorted to ad hominem and trying to funny, it's pretty clear you don't have any.
Thanks anyway for commenting to my initial question.
TinyBurbz t1_j5kunwc wrote
>I'm quite sure at this point that you understand what I mean even if my examples weren't that great.
You don't even know what you mean. You gave examples, but you weren't able to describe what you mean. Unless, you really do mean "the consumer market determines that it likes AI music and movies" which as I mentioned, is an artificial representation anyway.
​
>In your initial post you asserted that AIs will never surpass humans in what you called "subjectively meaningful tasks", citing their lack of i) will, ii) life and iii) ability to sense the world around them, as arguments.I gave my argument for why I believe they may,
Well you're objectively wrong. They dont.
​
​
>which is that I think our brains can be perfectly modeled as computing machines.
Don't hold your breath, it might be decades.
​
> I replied in the hope of hearing more about your thoughts and arguments for your position.
I don't do pseudointellectualistic debates. Facts are facts. Dont like it, tough.
>Seeing how you fail to give any arguments to support your point and instead have resorted to ad hominem and trying to funny, it's pretty clear you don't have any.
See above, I am not here to argue. Just tell you to stop being pseudointellectual. Not insulting you here, you sound to me like a ego-head teenager or delusional young adult. You haven't even begun to ascend the slope of enlightenment yet.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments