Ribak145 t1_j57aoy8 wrote
No I think you're on to something, I just think its much simpler than that - alignment of AI systems with humans is already difficult (to my knowledge not yet solved), but the much bigger problem is that even we humans are not aligned, so even if we 'solve' the alignment problem (which imo is unsolvable), we still only align the AI systems to their engineers/owners and ignore 99,9% of the rest
AsheyDS t1_j57uni0 wrote
What's wrong with a personal AI system being aligned with it's owner? It would just mean that the owner has to take responsibility for the actions and behaviors of the AI.
Ribak145 t1_j57uzuz wrote
there is nothing 'wrong' with it per se, it is just going to massively enhance the owner capabilities compared to other non owning entities, think a US-Billionare compared to a starving Zebra in the African savanne
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments