Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Mortal-Region t1_j2plfw1 wrote

Yeah, but some people think the simulators will halt our simulation before we're able to make sub-simulations precisely to avoid that scenario (endlessly proliferating sub-simulations).

2

Chispy t1_j2pu0pd wrote

Why would they want to avoid that scenario though? Seems like the goal scenario to me.

1

Mortal-Region t1_j2pzajw wrote

My guess is that the goal of the simulation is to model Earth in the 20th & 21st centuries. So say they've got resources set aside for N such Earth simulations. They can run N simulations one after the other, halting each before sub-simulations become possible, or they can allow an N-deep stack of simulations to form. The problem with the second option is that the simulations will become less-and-less accurate representations of the 20th/21st century as you go down the stack. Copies of copies of copies. Also, you'll need to allocate memory for all N simulations to run at once, whereas with the first option you only need memory for 1 simulation at a time.

On the other hand, I'm sure they/we will run many different kinds of simulations, so the question really is: of the kinds that contain conscious people living in the 21st century, which is most common?

1

Kinexity t1_j2pu9zp wrote

Running a simulation inside a simulation would be like an OS running a VM. The amount of nesting could be almost infinite.

1