Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

TFenrir t1_j57v4lg wrote

Have you actually seen the models coming out of Google? Read their research papers? There is no question that they are not just pioneers, they literally set the benchmarks

14

visarga t1_j59tx2d wrote

Maybe their 'amazing' PaLM model has issues we don't know about. chatGPT was intensely and adversarially studied for a month and a half.

1

TFenrir t1_j59zier wrote

I don't think that's the case. Please read the papers, look into the actual research - it sounds like you are like... Mad at Google, but that's a separate consideration than the tech they have. It's unquestionably better than any other LLMs we know about, regardless of how you feel about Google

2

visarga t1_j5lv4bc wrote

The point I was making is that without direct access to the model we don't know. It's easy to hide the embarrassing things and only show the nice ones. Maybe the model does get lower perplexity, but it also has to be aligned properly, and OpenAI ain't so open about their alignment work, we can't be sure what is the gap now.

1