crua9 t1_j6ft190 wrote
It will be interesting to see what happens. If they will try to protect jobs
dee_lio t1_j6g8pfz wrote
Depends who is writing the biggest check. The other problem is that I'm not convinced that this can be "bought."
There are going to be rouge AIs, corrupt AIs, etc.
crua9 t1_j6gbida wrote
>There are going to be rouge AIs, corrupt AIs, etc.
It's the same as rouge software, corrupt software, and so on.
Anyways, I think it is proper for us on here to talk about robot rights and other things. But the problem with making actual laws is unlike other tech. What is being made will massively change the world. And if it gets to the point many of us want. It's the first time humans created life in such a way that never has existed in the known universe.
GPT-5entient t1_j6k0diy wrote
>If they will try to protect jobs
They might, but it will definitely not be slowing down the development. AGI is the invention to end all inventions and if the US is the first one to develop it that will give it a massive eg up (to put it extremely mildly). Imagine weapons development in an AGI scenario - it would make enemy armies look like Roman legions in comparison. It is fucking scary but if we don't get there first someone else will - most likely China and that would be much scarier.
I would like to see a CHIPS act like development or ideally a massive, CERN-like, inter-government project to develop AGI the "right way". Pour trillions into it if necessary.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments