Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

VoraciousTrees t1_j6uq6u8 wrote

Earth background is .3uSv/hr = .00003rad/hr.... rads halved by 7cm of h2o shielding... Surface rads at 360 rads/hr... 360*(.5)^x = 3E-5 -> 3E-5/360=.5^x

Log(12E6^-1) / Log(.5) = x

x = ~23.5

23.5 * .07m = ~ 1.65 meters of ice.

So TLDM : If you stay under about 1.7 meters of ice (maybe a little more due to density concerns) you should only experience normal earth background radiation... on paper.

192

vbcbandr t1_j6vdzyw wrote

I only did the math in my head...but it appears to check out.

91

NoRoom2dark t1_j6vgzhp wrote

You must have a big forehead.

63

Eph_the_Beef t1_j6vq447 wrote

Yeah same. This one was actually kinda hard, took me like 4 or 5 seconds to calculate.

9

maxcorrice t1_j6xew6f wrote

Nearly had a stroke looking at this

4

VoraciousTrees t1_j6xlm4k wrote

Napkins are where real math gets done, for everything else there's CAD.

5

maxcorrice t1_j6xmvf3 wrote

I’m not taking about the quality of it i’m talking about the complexity of it some of us only just barely finished algebra

3

KrazzeeKane t1_j6y0vk9 wrote

Much like my wife tells me, "It's bold that you think I finished at all"

5

maxcorrice t1_j6y1mn3 wrote

I’m not a cop you don’t need to pretend there’s any non financial relationship between you and her

2

amitym t1_j709r1s wrote

Interestingly, the hypothetical ocean would be deeper under the ice than that, implying a much lower background radiation exposure than on Earth.

Which suggests a lower mutation rate for any life forms that live there. Although of course that might depend on whether they evolved to be more mutation prone as a meta-evolutionary strategy....

3