Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Alvazhar t1_ja6xfdv wrote

Itโ€™s kinda nuts how far weโ€™ve come technology wise since we were last up there. Canโ€™t wait for Artemis

1

Ethric_The_Mad t1_ja6xv1o wrote

Is the southern hemisphere like, the ass? Is this the moon's ass?

10

Best_Ad9376 t1_ja6zqk1 wrote

Very cool. I always wonder how big one of those spots are. Is it like a country or rather a city?

24

Dapperdanmun t1_ja77609 wrote

Itโ€™s just floating on space time like itโ€™s nothing

4

tom04cz t1_ja7r29c wrote

Really weird to realise that you are staring at an enormous object in space everytine for me

1

Fancy_Female t1_ja7toh3 wrote

I don't understand. Why don't we just nuke the damn moon? Problem solved.

1

myaccc t1_ja8af02 wrote

Very nice. What gear and settings did you use?

1

Hopepersonified t1_ja8x5io wrote

One day, maybe in my lifetime but I doubt it, we'll take these pics and see twinkling lights looking back at us.

1

MyCleverNewName t1_ja92t0c wrote

๐ŸŽถ...and if the post you're in starts singing different tunes, I'll see you on the left-side of the moon!๐ŸŽถ

1

brinkase t1_ja9371b wrote

Does this directly correlate to normal lens? What aperture does the telescope have? Must be pretty low if 1/200 ISO200 is sufficient.

Would I get similar results with my Canon 70-200mm 2.8?

1

EduardoVrd OP t1_ja94vuo wrote

The aperture of the telescope is 102mm which means i have 1000mm to reach objects in the sky. I shot the moon at 6pm while the sun was still high in the sky, that's why I used 1/200. I have a 75-300mm lens, and shooting at 300mm doesn't let you come close to the moon so i am not sure if you can have a nice photo of the moon with 200mm, BUT... you can use those 2.8 to do deep sky photography

1

PilotAbilen3 t1_ja96i31 wrote

Legend says Ed Harris is still up there waiting for Truman

1

SubLordHawk t1_ja9jdt5 wrote

Upside down Moon! The endtimes have come!

PANIC!

1