This is what 7 minutes of exposure time looks like on a dark, moonless night at Zabriskie Point, Death Valley (USA)!peeweekid OP t1_jdvqepa wrote
Reply to comment by --Ty-- in This is what 7 minutes of exposure time looks like on a dark, moonless night at Zabriskie Point, Death Valley (USA)! by peeweekid
In landscape astrophotography it's very common practice to shoot the sky and ground separately. For the sky exposure you use a star tracker that locks onto the sky as it rotates to prevent the stars from trailing (which of course causes the foreground to be blurry). Then you shoot the foreground without the tracker and line them up the way they would have if it was a single exposure.
the-vindicator t1_jdw4cp5 wrote
How did you get that cloud in bottom right of the sky to look stationary?
peeweekid OP t1_jdwmy4c wrote
Great question, since the cloud got really weird from the stacked sky exposures I took it from a single frame and put it back where it should have been before stacking.
--Ty-- t1_jdwac7b wrote
I get that, I just think that it's important to state whether a photo is an actual photo, or a composite. Once you get into the realm of composites, virtually anything is possible, which means the work should be perceived and judged differently.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments