Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

crappyITkid t1_it8ks52 wrote

But then you see headlines of 7 different species evolving to basically become a crab. Makes you wonder how often species could convergently evolve into a form similar to ours.

6

socialkaosx t1_it8obmz wrote

I think you don't quite understand what I'm writing about. Imagine the ladder of evolution, from unicellular to human.

Now extend the ladder three times.

It is beyond the reach of human brains.
Probably this will be the case with consciousness, physics, quantum physics or ai or a thousand other things.

Our heads will not be able to understand it, just as a spider will never understand a children's colouring book ; )

0

crappyITkid t1_it8ynnz wrote

I think you're really over complicating evolution and life to a degree that breaches into the realm of fantasy. Alien life is constrained by the exact some rules of physics as we are. I don't think there's any reason (yet) to believe life as we've observed it on planet Earth is not a common phenomena in the cosmos.

9

RedditMods_R_Nazis t1_it9pljc wrote

The evolution of life on Earth is/was dependent on the evolution of the Earth itself. We know several global extinction events have happened in Earth’s past. These events are all unique to Earth and the life that was on Earth at the times of those events evolved uniquely because of those events. Also, just because physics seems to have rules, most of which we don’t really understand fully, doesn’t necessarily mean those same physics apply to all areas of the universe. We assume physics is the same everywhere but we don’t really know for sure. Life may be very common but to think it’s similar to the life that evolved on Earth isn’t a fair comparison or assumption. We don’t really know.

−1

socialkaosx t1_it90u1o wrote

: D yes? so prove it

because quantum physics seems to contradict the fact that our world exists at all in a physical sense

−6

ZylonBane t1_it9y7j9 wrote

Ooh, tell us about how bumblebees can't fly.

3

Ragnarok314159 t1_itbkuos wrote

You are looking at this in the wrong perspective.

It would be more like taking someone from 300 years ago into the future vs 3000 to 30,000 years ago. A person from 300 years ago would be mystified by what we have, but if they are slightly educated will accept the wonders of modern society.

A person from 3000 years could be communicated with on some level, but have little understanding. This world would not be theirs.

30,000 years, it would be next to impossible, but they could learn.

A spider cannot conceptualize our world because it has no need. Aliens would land and do alien things, and because we have a basic understanding of the greater principles of the world could get that space ship fly. You might be of the level of the spider, but others are not.

1

socialkaosx t1_itbsgcd wrote

A simple example - maybe any observed or not (dark energy) cosmic phenomenon are your aliens? How do you verify this? Like someone here wrote that "it's not a crab" or "it doesn't have an eye" ? : )

1

socialkaosx t1_itbrk3n wrote

Why do you continue to assume that you will be able to understand "aliens" with your mind?
If they live in a different time in a different dimension, perhaps they live at a different speed or scale so in your short life you won't even be able to see it.

You have such a very Christian approach. You think everything is just like you.
This is bloody naive.

0