KaneHau t1_iu5l9eg wrote
These days we take great pains to not do that exact thing. (Earlier missions, not so much so.)
Mainly, because if we detect life on other planets - we have to make sure we didn't introduce the life ourself. (And vice-versa.)
Now, once we have explored some promising planet or moon, and determined that there is no meaningful life there - then terraforming because more feasible.
isnisse OP t1_iu5m1s5 wrote
I wish the space comunity had some clear lines when to begin that step on Mars. I would love to see a micrope colony followed up by a rover in My life time.
frustrated_staff t1_iu5oohe wrote
There are laws preventing spreading life to other worlds (at least for the time being)
Mother_Nebula904 t1_iu5sa2v wrote
imagine going to supermax for that
[deleted] t1_iu5wjet wrote
[removed]
MikeWise1618 t1_iu5smdb wrote
Probably the biggest reason we don't do that at the moment is the fear that it could eliminate native life forms that we could learn a lot from. Probably overblown as the native forms are likely to be better adapted. But certainly possible.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments