Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

KaneHau t1_iu5l9eg wrote

These days we take great pains to not do that exact thing. (Earlier missions, not so much so.)

Mainly, because if we detect life on other planets - we have to make sure we didn't introduce the life ourself. (And vice-versa.)

Now, once we have explored some promising planet or moon, and determined that there is no meaningful life there - then terraforming because more feasible.

7

isnisse OP t1_iu5m1s5 wrote

I wish the space comunity had some clear lines when to begin that step on Mars. I would love to see a micrope colony followed up by a rover in My life time.

−3

MikeWise1618 t1_iu5smdb wrote

Probably the biggest reason we don't do that at the moment is the fear that it could eliminate native life forms that we could learn a lot from. Probably overblown as the native forms are likely to be better adapted. But certainly possible.

1