Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

JUYED-AWK-YACC t1_irbsozk wrote

I always cringe when I see these, but I don't have the numbers for Galileo. I mean, I'm glad Juno had a decent flyby, but it's been done.

8

Frank_Perfectly t1_ird93h1 wrote

Wait. Did you just “meh” a fly-by photo of Europa?

5

JUYED-AWK-YACC t1_ireugah wrote

I worked Galileo, so been there done that. It's not a record altitude (200 km) and the image was taken with the star scanner, not a science instrument.

2

volcanopele t1_iriqdi2 wrote

It’s also been almost 23 years since the last Galileo flyby of Europa. Yes, Galileo had higher resolution cameras, but Juno has things like MWR that can actually due ice-penetrating measurements.

While the SRU didn’t start out as a science instrument, it is officially one now in the extended mission. Higher resolution than JunoCAM and more sensitive so it can take pictures in Jupiter-shine that JunoCAM can’t really do.

1

JUYED-AWK-YACC t1_irjm2cg wrote

I'm not saying this is a bad image. I know a lot of people onJuno and it's a worthwhile mission. I'm just reacting to the recency bias.

1