Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

bikernaut t1_itxzeor wrote

When they say Arctic orbit, do they mean polar orbit? IE: North/south over both poles or something else?

2

Adeldor t1_ity0rbj wrote

Pure speculation on my part ...

Either they mean polar orbit as you say, or perhaps they mean Molniya orbit. Without being mentioned by name, the latter is perhaps an outside chance.

1

bikernaut t1_ity1dh2 wrote

Oh, that's interesting, each satellite would have around 12 hours above the north, though at that distance, communications would be difficult. I guess with 9 satellites, it'd be something less extreme to maximize dwell and provide good comms.

Could you use balloons in the north like Google's Loon project? It's not that big of an area, but has to be hugely cheaper and simpler than satellites?

1

Adeldor t1_ity2s00 wrote

A big problem with balloons is the much lower altitude, requiring many more to cover an equivalent area (horizon is much closer).

Also, currently balloon relay technology has thus far proved impractical for long term, high reliability coverage, with longevity and long term station keeping being thorny problems.

Meanwhile, Russia understands well Molniya orbits, having used them for decades. So it wouldn't surprise me if indeed these new satellites are destined for such.

1