Submitted by Pure_Candidate_3831 t3_yecpbj in space
Comments
Adeldor t1_ity0rbj wrote
Pure speculation on my part ...
Either they mean polar orbit as you say, or perhaps they mean Molniya orbit. Without being mentioned by name, the latter is perhaps an outside chance.
bikernaut t1_ity1dh2 wrote
Oh, that's interesting, each satellite would have around 12 hours above the north, though at that distance, communications would be difficult. I guess with 9 satellites, it'd be something less extreme to maximize dwell and provide good comms.
Could you use balloons in the north like Google's Loon project? It's not that big of an area, but has to be hugely cheaper and simpler than satellites?
Adeldor t1_ity2s00 wrote
A big problem with balloons is the much lower altitude, requiring many more to cover an equivalent area (horizon is much closer).
Also, currently balloon relay technology has thus far proved impractical for long term, high reliability coverage, with longevity and long term station keeping being thorny problems.
Meanwhile, Russia understands well Molniya orbits, having used them for decades. So it wouldn't surprise me if indeed these new satellites are destined for such.
pumpkinfarts23 t1_itz4aq5 wrote
Yes: https://space.skyrocket.de/doc_sdat/arktika-m.htm
Also, the first was supposed to be launched in 2013, but launched last year. Take 2026 with quite a grain of salt.
[deleted] t1_itxa5ta wrote
[removed]