Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

s1ngular1ty2 t1_j273k1z wrote

Because gravity becomes so strong at the event horizon no material could survive the stresses to do what you are saying. It's literally impossible.

20

LordRobin------RM t1_j27885y wrote

I thought it was tidal forces, not the simple strength of the gravitational field, that destroyed objects as they passed the event horizon. I’ve read several times that you could fall into the event horizon of, say, a supermassive black hole and not feel a thing. The event horizon for a black hole of that size is so far away from the singularity that tidal forces are almost non-existent.

9

PhobosDown t1_j27b0xy wrote

Exactly right - the more massive the black hole the gentler the tidal forces at the event horizon.

For example, stars can be torn apart by a million solar mass black hole, creating tidal disruption events that have been observed in synoptic surveys. At a billion solar masses though, the black hole swallows stars whole because the tidal forces aren’t strong enough to disrupt the star before it enters the event horizon.

6

LordRobin------RM t1_j27s8do wrote

Wow, has this been observed?

2

PhobosDown t1_j29t44q wrote

Tidal disruptions have been, yes. They are also simulated in supercomputers and they were predicted decades before they were observed!

The direct “swallowing” of a star by a billion solar mass black hole has not been observed. One way to think about it is this event would just involve the center of the galaxy decreasing in brightness by 1 star’s worth, whereas a tidal disruption event is like fireworks - a lot of energy gets released and if we happen to have a telescope checking on that galaxy at least every few weeks, we’ll see it.

2

LordRobin------RM t1_j2c1e4h wrote

Right, now that I take the time to think about it, a “swallowing” wouldn’t look exciting at all, even observed from within the galaxy. The doomed star’s light would just red-shift as it approached until the wavelength was unobservable.

2

s1ngular1ty2 t1_j27alyq wrote

His entire premise is laughable at best so I'm not going to waste more time explaining why your misconception is also wrong.

−6

sterexx t1_j279ekc wrote

passing the event horizon of a supermassive black hole could be fine. very small tidal forces

getting hit by matter orbiting it could be pretty dangerous though

5

s1ngular1ty2 t1_j27apb0 wrote

You clearly did not follow what I was saying...

−5

csukoh78 t1_j27bjm2 wrote

This is not true of larger black holes. Only small ones. Larger black holes have EH that allow uneventful passage.

3

s1ngular1ty2 t1_j27bn9h wrote

Clearly you didn't follow what I said. I'm just going to let you ponder it longer. You may catch up.

−8

csukoh78 t1_j27bzkk wrote

Your comment is wrong and requires revision. Not a lot to think about. No need to be rude. Rudeness and sarcasm are the recourses of a weak mind.

5

Impossible_Pop620 OP t1_j273rx2 wrote

See, I get what you're saying, but it's theoretically possible, no? Without faster-than-light stuff?

−1

bradland t1_j275s79 wrote

No, it is theoretically impossible. Gravity beyond the event horizon is powerful enough to tear matter apart. As in, literally rip atoms apart. No material, no matter how exotic could ever be used to lower anything into a black hole. It would literally tear anything apart, atom by atom.

17

Impossible_Pop620 OP t1_j275ymh wrote

OK, how long would this take? If we made the capsule, say 10km wide...give us a few minutes?

4

bradland t1_j277vup wrote

Infinitesimal fractions of a second. It is difficult to even conceive the forces that occur near a black hole.

Gravity on Earth is 1 g. A black hole with a mass equivalent to our Sun would have a gravitational force of around 1.6 trillion g. A very fast car like a Tesla Model S can accelerate at 1 g. A really fast missile can accelerate at 100 g. The gravity at the event horizon would accelerate every atom in the theoretical 10 km capsule 1.6 trillion times faster than a Tesla Model S, and hundreds of billions of times faster than the fastest rocket you can imagine.

The reality is that no capsule we could ever hope to construct would survive even approaching the event horizon, much less passing it and returning. No matter in the entire universe could survive it.

26

stalagtits t1_j27dc4f wrote

Pure acceleration by a black hole (or any other massive body), with no strong tidal forces present (as in a supermassive black hole), would be completely unnoticeable by the passenger of a capsule falling towards a black hole. Every atom in the capsule would experience the exact same acceleration, so there would be no net forces within the capsule.

2

TheSortingHate t1_j2775lb wrote

You may be misunderstanding how the breakdown happens. Gravity isn’t pulling it apart from the outside-in. It’s ripping it all apart simultaneously. Making it bigger changes nothing on the time it takes to break apart. In fact, it probably would just break faster.

4

ExtonGuy t1_j276v1m wrote

A few minutes for what? Once the capsule, or cable (or any part of them), crosses the EH, it disappears to the external universe. No electron, photon, proton, quark, etc can go from the inside to the outside.

Baring some really weird Hawking radiation concepts, which take trillions of years to get any information out from a reasonable size BH.

3

stanksnax t1_j274x8e wrote

If by theoretically you mean completely ignoring several basic principles of the very nature of space time, relativity, gravity and engineering then yes, it's possible.

14

Impossible_Pop620 OP t1_j27512w wrote

You only mentioned material stresses in 1st reply...

−4

borange01 t1_j275c88 wrote

He wasn't the one that posted the first reply

10

hex00110 t1_j274u5i wrote

I think not possible , as the gravity would literally pull the atoms apart of whatever material you extend into and beyond the EH

6

archlich t1_j279rgb wrote

Gravity overcomes the EM field which propagates at the speed of light that holds molecules together. It is literally impossible to create a tether that would survive.

2