McKavian t1_iz325am wrote
Why is anyone surprised that a more advanced telescope is showing more detailed images?
In 20/30 years, there will be another telescope that will make JWT look like the Hubble.
I am not downplaying the JWT in the slightest, I am sure it will do great things.
deadindead t1_iz5iutp wrote
Is anyone saying they’re surprised? I think we’re just amazed by the level of detail they achieved with JWST. It just so happens that it’s a lot more detail than the ~30 year old Hubble
McKavian t1_iz5nobg wrote
It's in the title. "...finding things that Hubble didn't." That seems dismissive of Hubble's accomplishments.
deadindead t1_iz5odo5 wrote
I mean factually speaking, hubble didn’t see those things. Should they sugarcoat it to spare Hubbles feelings? I’m confused what you’re upset about 😂
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments