Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

mike-foley t1_j1lrs5y wrote

Still wondering why the national aeronautics and space administration is doing earth science/climate change stuff that, Imho, should be done by NOAA.

7

SwiftFlyingHawk t1_j1mwhhx wrote

They do a lot of geospatial data which is incredibly important to earth science and understanding how the earth is affected by climate change and other factors

5

laserwolf2000 t1_j1mg2we wrote

They do earth science stuff that involves satellites or data only obtainable from space, makes sense to me

4

mike-foley t1_j1n088e wrote

That’s my point. NOAA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration should be budgeted for this and they could use some of that budget to hire NASA to take care of the launching of necessary. NASA should be looking outward, NOAA should be looking inward. So much of our climate is affected by the water that covers this planet.

3

patrickisnotawesome t1_j1ntvt7 wrote

So NOAA does have some space missions (like the GOES weather satellites), but instead of standing up a whole new space design, acquisition, and management arm within NOAA, NASA tends to manage the day to day construction and operations of these missions. This ensures the taxpayers aren’t paying for two separate civilian agencies with redundant capabilities. NOAA gets to work on earth science (their expertise) and NASA builds and flys spacecraft (their expertise). It’s a win-win

2