Radiant_Nothing_9940 t1_j69j3ke wrote
Why the fuck it this being posted 2 months after the mission?
KristnSchaalisahorse t1_j69msj5 wrote
From the article (which was published yesterday):
>Reams of data needed to be analyzed by NASA’s teams to make sure that Artemis I didn’t succeed in spite of serious problems. Fortunately that does not seem to be the case: Although the teams are still working through the terabytes of raw data, the agency has pronounced the mission good enough to endorse its sequel.
Radiant_Nothing_9940 t1_j69q09e wrote
Ok fair enough. Still think it’s pretty clickbaity though.
Meior t1_j6aza97 wrote
Not sure how not calling the results before you have the actual data is clickbait. I'd say that's unusually responsible journalism.
Radiant_Nothing_9940 t1_j6c6if4 wrote
I mean the Reddit repost and title. It doesn’t tell anyone that that’s what the article’s about.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments