Submitted by Thirdy-DOg t3_10fr5ai in space
SweatyFLMan1130 t1_j51b1o1 wrote
Reply to comment by peter303_ in Are Two Tidally Locked Earth in One Solar System Possible? by Thirdy-DOg
This kind of boggles my mind cause I knew our moon was unusually large as far as such bodies go relative to their planets, but the fact it's only 2% while exerting 17ish% the gravity on its surface as we have on Earth seems counterintuitive. I know that proximity to the center of the mass influences how strong the gravitational attraction is, but damn, that's way more skewed than I had imagined.
Underhill42 t1_j5373lw wrote
If density is constant then surface gravity increases linearly with radius: an r^(3) mass divided by gravity's r^(2) falloff.
So 10x the gravity means 10x the diameter and 1000x the mass. Crazy!
Density skews things, but even ignoring it is good enough for a sanity check. (I'm pretty sure 2x the density = 2x the gravity at the same size)
Effective-Avocado470 t1_j52g6u8 wrote
It's a volume and density thing, when you're dealing with cubed radii it gets a bit non intuitive
[deleted] t1_j52gtxj wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments