lunex t1_j529fom wrote
Reply to comment by pmMeAllofIt in Ancient humans and their early depictions of the universe: “It is no exaggeration to say that astronomy has existed as an exact science for more than five millennia,” writes the late science historian John North. by clayt6
Have you heard the theory going around that Graham Hancock is actually much much older than he claims to be? Some are saying he’s maybe as much as 13,000 years old and an immortal descendent of the same pre-Ice Age civilization he talks about on his show. Ever since this theory surfaced Hancock has been running scared, and has refused to take a simple blood test which would prove his DNA is ancient. And yet he won’t. You have to wonder, why is that? Do your own research and connect the dots. Could Graham Hancock really be suppressing his own lost pre-historic origins? Ancient Hancock Theorists say: yes!
RodgerRodgy t1_j52g06u wrote
This is my new Graham Hancock headcanon.
lunex t1_j52h96u wrote
It just makes too much sense, right?
[deleted] t1_j529yx4 wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments