Tentsni t1_j52a6p3 wrote
z57 t1_j52bf38 wrote
Absolutely not all of it. For example, nothing of the interpretation of whatever pillar # that gets much attention (I think 42).
There's a few other things here or there that are compelling. But in general much of it is unsubstantiated, subjective, personal opinion he espouses with a very authoritative narrative sounding perspective.
Hancock aside the sophistication of the Tepe sites are very impressive and about 2x older than Egypt or Stonehenge
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments