Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

rba22 t1_j56wrhg wrote

Do you mean will it be a planet again? Because it was once recognized as a planet.

10

rosen380 t1_j56wxso wrote

...as soon as it "clears it's neighboring region of other objects". :)

18

rosen380 t1_j56xlnc wrote

That isn't part of the reason it was "downgraded" to dwarf planet though... per the IAU these are the requirements:

  1. It is in orbit around the Sun.
  2. It has sufficient mass to assume hydrostatic equilibrium (a nearly round shape).
  3. It has “cleared the neighborhood” around its orbit.

Pluto meets the first two, just not the third.

14

rickny0 t1_j56y7nr wrote

IMO Pluto lost its status because astronomers kept discovering more Pluto-sized objects orbiting the sun and they didn’t want to add a bunch of new planets. (Eris · Ceres · Haumea · Makemake)

11

AduroTri t1_j56yau3 wrote

It WAS a planet. But it's now a dwarf planet. Technically it can still be seen as a planet though.

2

brohamsontheright t1_j56z7bf wrote

I like to think that if Pluto works and and believes in itself, it can one day become anything it wants!!!!!!

10

GiraffeWithATophat t1_j5702dw wrote

If we ever change our technical definition of a "planet" then it could be recognized as one again.

Regarding your second edit, you can kind of think of it that way. The moon orbits the earth like pluto orbits the sun. However for it to be called a "moon" the object needs to be orbiting something other than a star.

5

menezesja t1_j570hpk wrote

Since it hasn't cleared it's orbit in the last million years it probably won't do it in the next few

1

mikevago t1_j570ibs wrote

I just wrote a kids' book about the solar system, and my take is that it's not that Pluto isn't a planet. It's that we now have so many planets we need multiple categories for them, and Pluto absolutely fits better into the "dwarf planet" category than the "rocky/inner planet" category.

5

space-ModTeam t1_j570lod wrote

Hello u/twurbster, your submission "Will Pluto ever be a planet?" has been removed from r/space because:

  • Such questions should be asked in the "All space questions" thread stickied at the top of the sub.

Please read the rules in the sidebar and check r/space for duplicate submissions before posting. If you have any questions about this removal please message the r/space moderators. Thank you.

1

GodzlIIa t1_j570lr5 wrote

Thats the difference between "would it ever be recognized as a planet again" vs "will it ever be a planet again". It was NEVER a planet based on current definitions, but it was called a planet in the past.

Is OP asking if definitions might change calling it a planet, or is op asking will it somehow fit current definitions in the future.

3

Dahnlor t1_j5716jp wrote

Nitpick: Ceres is in the Asteroid Belt and was discovered in 1801. Its discovery was not unlike that of Pluto, and it was considered to be a planet until after several other asteroids were discovered.

Pluto's discovery and eventual recategorization was pretty much the same situation, except that every new Kuiper Belt Object wasn't being counted as another new planet. When Eris was discovered, which is larger than Pluto, it forced the IAU's hand in creating an actual definition for "planet".

3

mcvoid1 t1_j571wp9 wrote

I have some questions that need to be answered.

  • Should Ceres be a planet? It's the largest asteroid in the asteroid belt (by a very wide margin) and is round, and about 9.1 × 10^20 kg. (Pluto is 1.30900 × 10^22 kg, so only about 10x bigger)
  • Should Eris be a planet? It's the largest object in the Kuiper belt that we know of. It's also round, and is bigger than Pluto (1.67 × 10^22 kg, so like 25% bigger than Pluto)

Really what's going on is that there's kind of four "zones" of planetoids.

  • The rocky planet zone
  • The inner asteroid belt (where Ceres is)
  • The gas giant zone
  • The outer asteroid belt (where Eris and Pluto are)

The definition of planet makes it that it basically rules out the two asteroid belts because who knows where to draw the line between what in there is a planet and what isn't a planet.

So if we're including the stuff in those two zones, where should the line be drawn?

3

joedimer t1_j574swu wrote

Neptune and Pluto are pretty much never any where near each other so Neptune can’t clear Pluto. Plus Pluto is on a different plane than the rest of the solar system. Neptune is like 8000 time more massive than Pluto so it would most definitely clear it if they ever ran into each other, it’s just that they never have and likely never will.

4

Dont____Panic t1_j5756gj wrote

They’ve created a class of object called a minor planet. It’s large enough to pull itself into a sphere, but it has an odd orbit, and hasn’t cleared its local area.

It is, however, quite different from an asteroid like Vesta which are oblong and in a “belt” of other objects.

2

scoopedy_coop t1_j576nha wrote

Is this the father of renowned scientist Scroopy Noopers?

1