Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

wifespissed t1_j64d1qq wrote

How come Columbia always feels like it's totally overshadowed by Challenger even though it's more recent? Or is it because I was 10 when Challenger blew up and in my mid 20s when Columbia went. Did it hit me harder as a child maybe?

3

DredZedPrime t1_j64kjos wrote

Partly because Challenger was the first time something quite like that had happened in the American space program. The Apollo fire was on the ground during a training session, not even an actual launch, and by the time Columbia happened it was just a part of history that a space shuttle had already lown up once.

Then there's also the fact that the shuttles were still relatively new at the time of the Challenger disaster, and kids across the country were watching the launch live, partly due to a teacher being one of the astronauts, so it was kind of a publicity thing.

Columbia was still a tragedy and impacted many people greatly, but it just wasn't quite as unique a situation.

7

rodface t1_j64n7lk wrote

Perhaps it has something to do with how much physically closer Challenger was, and the images that were produced because of it. The Challenger vapor cloud is one of those images that is up close and visceral. Columbia's disintegration, not as much.

5