I'm not really able to follow your thought process here, but the half life of all isotopes of Moscovium are on the order of ms. So, it'd be pretty useless as anything other than an alpha source.
Supernovae are the natural source of heavy element production in the universe. With that being said, if there was a stable isotope of element 115, we'd expect to have discovered it on Earth so I'm very doubtful of Lazar's claims.
White holes are a valid solution to Einsten' field equations with certain constraints applied. If they existed, they would be the brightest objects in the universe. We've yet to observe a white hole so it appears they are a mathematical curiosity rather than a reality.
But what if they're in fact isn't a stable isotope, who's to say the unstable isotope is the reason for its unnatural Behavior? Or maybe Earth just doesn't qualify for the conditions for the unstable isotope to become a stable isotope. I am a high school dropout, so I have a lot more research to do regarding Isotopes in the properties and pretty much everything involving the production of heavy elements or any element to be exact.
Own_Praline_6277 t1_j5n2he2 wrote
I'm not really able to follow your thought process here, but the half life of all isotopes of Moscovium are on the order of ms. So, it'd be pretty useless as anything other than an alpha source.