Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

funnybalu1 t1_jbspng2 wrote

Of all of skiing.

−1

madladolle t1_jbsqpy0 wrote

Considering there were alot less races per season during Stenmarks time, and the fact that he was so dominant that they had to change the rules - i'd argue otherwise

3

AJ877 t1_jbt1wfb wrote

> Considering there were alot less races per season during Stenmarks time

That argument doesn't really work when Shiffrin has actually done it in fewer races, and has a higher win percentage than Inge.

4

arn_g t1_jbvr5ad wrote

She actually doesn't. 246 starts and 87 victories, vs Stenmarks 230 starts and 86 victories.

That's not to say that her achievement isn't insanely incredible.

PS: Her World Championships stats are slightly better and her Olympic stats slightly worse than Ingemar's.

1

AJ877 t1_jbwz1tx wrote

Where do you find the stat about Stenmark's 230 starts? Because commentators yesterday and FIS have been saying that Stenmark had 271 World Cup starts in his career.

1

arn_g t1_jbwzibb wrote

https://www.fis-ski.com/DB/general/athlete-biography.html?sectorcode=AL&competitorid=58663&type=career

I'm gonna assume the stats on FIS own website are correct, but who knows lol

I've also heard 232 before, but never 271

1

AJ877 t1_jbx0cdh wrote

That's weird, I don't know where did they get 271 then. They showed graphic of win percentage across individual sports, and Stenmark was credited 271 starts.

1

funnybalu1 t1_jc1i5gz wrote

Still that's 35 vs 37 percent win rate. Anybody claiming those 2 percent points make any other than a mathematical difference is just a hater. Considering that Shiffrin is likely to keep on winning, she will most certainly go on to pass Stenmark and become the undoubted GOAT. Hard to swallow pills: Women can be crazy good, even the best ever, at sports too and records are still made to be broken, however old they might be.

1

arn_g t1_jc1icie wrote

I never claimed anything to the contrary and do completely agree

1