You must log in or register to comment.

blizzardfreshmen t1_iuo6bo9 wrote

Rafa still looks like a teenager when he smiles like that


adamusa51 t1_iuosh93 wrote

These two have the best bromance in sports. Class 24/7/365


dnph t1_iuppzmj wrote

After Nadal exposes his piece, what will he do with the shirt?


therlwl t1_iuox916 wrote

So the shirt will expose its private parts? The word you are looking for is displayed.


SunshineAlways t1_iupvfu3 wrote

Not everyone is a native speaker of English.


ChurchofPancake t1_iurfaxo wrote

So it’s a good thing that he corrected OP and provided a better word to use… assuming op wants to improve


SunshineAlways t1_iurqvvt wrote

I was able to decipher the meaning, so communication occurred. Were they being helpful or just correct? Intent matters.


ChurchofPancake t1_iurri60 wrote

Intent matters to a degree, but the commenter wasn’t particularly rude or mean about the mistake and their comment may help OP improve their English. You’re acting like their intent was to embarrass or be rude to OP but I disagree that’s the case and feel your knee-jerk defense of OP’s language skills is unwarranted

They could’ve just said “haha idiot you used ‘exposed’ wrong” but instead they basically explained why ‘exposed’ was flawed and suggested an alternative


SunshineAlways t1_iutzf75 wrote

I disagree that my considering the circumstances of OP’s word choice might be due to being a speaker of English as a second language was a “knee jerk” reaction. I put forth a possibility to consider.


ChurchofPancake t1_iuu3d5q wrote

I mean - I don’t think you spent too long musing over your comment and wondering if you should make it, I’m not sure why it wouldn’t be knee-jerk


cynicalspacecactus t1_iuq4rxa wrote

It is not even necessarily wrong. See "Exposition"/"Expo": An event where things are exposed.


ukuzonk t1_iuploco wrote

Exposed? 😳


dangerboi1976 t1_iuqlw8x wrote

Poor Novak. Always in their shadows.


count_montescu t1_iuqonvm wrote

If he manages to stick around for another 3 years, he has a chance of making the number for the most amount of slams. Not that he will be revered for it or even celebrated nearly as much as Roger or Rafa.


missprettybjk t1_iuqzvsn wrote

Because there are really no great men tennis players in his time. During the prime of Rafa and Roger, they had some contenders, now it’s very thin.


vicblck24 t1_iur7fcu wrote

Man, wonder what the line is to where they make a museum strictly for you.


deutschdachs t1_iurr3p1 wrote

TIL there's a Nadal Museum already


Nixon74 t1_iupf3d4 wrote

Wow… the rich get richer…



lordoflys t1_iuop08s wrote

The Rafa Nadel museum? Yeah. Definitely on my "to do list". Right after my visit to the 2nd largest ball of twine museum in North Dakota.


adamusa51 t1_iuosr34 wrote

As someone who taught tennis and loves it and played competitively into my 50s, I’d love to go. Rafa is one of the great athletes and sportspersons of all time. If you don’t get it, that’s your loss


BUDDHAKHAN t1_iup8wfe wrote

Yet you still clicked an article about Nadal and Federer and was even compelled to comment. If anyone has a hardon for these guys it must be you


Svard27 t1_iuqc6u3 wrote

Last I knew it’s actually in Kansas. Have you seen the largest ball on twine in Minnesota. Both attractions are much better than Wally World


ChurchofPancake t1_iurfghj wrote

Believe it or not, you are not the center of the universe and individuals with different personalities and interests exist outside of you (and thank god for that)