mlyster67 t1_ix59pvy wrote
Just gonna ignore the blindside/block in the back?
Johnnieroq t1_ix6j33a wrote
I seen that New York reviewed it and said it was from the side.
Pleaseusesomelogic t1_ix5a9k9 wrote
Right? But why do they always have to be so stupid. That was totally unnecessary but could have called the play back.
dnbreaks t1_ix7bfnq wrote
It looks as if 34 tries to draw the penalty. He runs over and then turns his back into contact.
cyberpunk_VCR t1_ix5rz3x wrote
Youre rrally over here complaining about a no-call and you cant even decide what penalty it should be.
It's not a blindside because the blocker was running in the direction of the play, and it's iffy at best to call that a shove in the back. If that's a block in the back then there are 100 missed block in the back calls every game.
Mandoman1963 t1_ix6nff9 wrote
The defender didn't have a chance to catch him, that's why it wasn't called.
rogerdalebigham t1_ix5p22o wrote
Right in the open.
Cichlidsaremyjam t1_ix8k0id wrote
It was reviewed by new york and confirmed to be from the side.
YouSummonedAStrawman t1_ix86wgs wrote
3 to 3 at the end?
What a boring game. These are like soccer scores. I don’t find defensive games fun to watch.
Dirk_The_Cowardly t1_ix5yxab wrote
That was obvious
[deleted] t1_ix6xfay wrote
[deleted]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments