Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

fedemasa t1_j0dk4hj wrote

During this WC Argentina vs Australia and France vs Denmark. Also his country was defeated by both so it seems it's the best decision

258

20060578 t1_j0e5go8 wrote

He screwed Australia in that game. We were Cleary the dominant side all game and he just handed it to the Argentinians because FIFA wanted the powerhouses like Australia out of the tournament.

104

Asmodean129 t1_j0e6ous wrote

You had me hook, line and sinker until the last sentence.

In all seriousness though, I felt that Aus did pretty well against Argentina. We just don't have a 'killer striker' who can change the flow of a game.

102

hlorghlorgh t1_j0fiqke wrote

So Australia is basically at Argentina's level, you just don't have a really really good striker?

10

HillaryRugmunch t1_j0fsb6m wrote

Lol yeah that is quite the stretch. You could probably use a good keeper as well. And a couple more defenders. And a good central midfielder. And a forward. And some depth on the bench. But yeah, you’re at Argentina’s level.

9

mochacub22 t1_j0hctej wrote

Australia has shooters. They’re just not name brand.

1

michealgaribaldi t1_j0dkpmf wrote

Oh wow so his crew didn’t work any quarters or semis? That seems odd no? Although I do get the need to have officials with no country ties…

76

Crs51 t1_j0eg5wb wrote

I didn't watch France vs Denmark very closely but the refereeing seemed fine there. In Argentina vs Australia i felt like the ref got fooled too often by Argentina's diving (especially Acuna) but other than that was ok.

This ref is probably the least controversial choice they could've made which I'm fine with.

11

Aden1970 t1_j0gbhkp wrote

He’ll be a busy little Ref if and when France go up by 2 goals and Argentina start playing dirty.

5