Comments
JKKIDD231 t1_j0gib8s wrote
BBL popularity about to Sky Rocket with YT ratings of this match alone gonne go thru the roof. Waiting for highlights to be posted on YT.
yellowbin74 t1_j0gqe5u wrote
I have to go find this- probably doesn't even need a highlight reel
someguyonline00 t1_j0ium6g wrote
How were there 6 lower NON-T20 scores??
WakeUpMareeple OP t1_j0j8bn4 wrote
Pitches in the 1800s were a lot tougher to bat on.
someguyonline00 t1_j0jdrnn wrote
Ah true, but I am still amazed that there was a lower (or equal) non-T20 score 40 years ago
NekkiGamGam t1_j0kimtf wrote
Henry Thorntons bowling figures were 5 for 3 off 2.5 overs. More wickets than runs conceded. how many times would that have happened ever?
ghoonrhed t1_j0gg3x1 wrote
For extra context, 15 runs for one person is considered not good you're a batter. Now imagine 11 of these people combined to score that.
KbbbbNZ t1_j0ncn3l wrote
Omg they didn't even last 6 overs.
- 5 runs, 1 wicket
- 2 runs, 2 wickets
- 2 runs, 2 wickets
- 0 runs, 1 wickets
- 5 runs, 2 wickets
- 1 run, 2 wickets
BLAGTIER t1_j0ga5q6 wrote
How to explain this. Ummm. Remember in the Mr Bean movie when he sneezes on Whistler's Mother and then rubs the painting with an ink soaked handkerchief spreading ink everywhere and then uses paint remover to remove the ink resulting in destroying the painted head of Whistler's Mother and Mr Bean uses a ball point pen to drew the head back on? This was more incompetent.
[deleted] t1_j0gg6we wrote
[removed]
StupidMastiff t1_j0gbev7 wrote
15?! Did the batsmen just launch their bats at the stumps and get themselves out?
WakeUpMareeple OP t1_j0gc1nv wrote
They'd probably have scored more if they'd tried that. It was mostly just outside edges through to the keeper, or the slips, or the gully...
StupidMastiff t1_j0gcxlk wrote
Fucking crazy, it doesn't seem possible for professionals to get so few runs.
Corey_Treverson420 t1_j0gni47 wrote
To be fair to Sydney, Thornton and then Agar put on a bowling masterclass…but those first 4 wickets really did the damage, after that it was a cleanup operation and the lower order batsmen nervous as hell were just dabbing at deliveries and the slips cleaned up
wongo t1_j0g7m75 wrote
Yikes, they're worse than the Broncos
Bradycolson1 t1_j0h2ns0 wrote
Iowa football has found its equal
dualFrequancy t1_j0i1i3n wrote
as a fan of American football and cricket this made me chuckle haha
FlagmantlePARRAdise t1_j0p0tg7 wrote
Brisbane or Denver?
WhatIfDog t1_j1rc9jl wrote
Both
FlagmantlePARRAdise t1_j1s64qz wrote
we finished ninth again
The richmond tigersbrisbane broncos finished ninth again
In any season you will see it is our fate
To miss out on the 8
We win a few then lose a lot
And then it is too late
Cause we're down the drain
We've never been much good since 1982 2006
Don't worry about it, Im an eels fan. At this rate I'll be lucky for my great grandchildren to see a premiership
StormtrooperMJS t1_j0ga639 wrote
HEY! No you're right. Continue.
sleeplessaddict t1_j0itwzz wrote
God damn it nowhere is safe for us
Skuxx_De-Silva_Lux t1_j0gdazj wrote
An Under 11's kid could make that total in less that 3 overs
FlotsamOfThe4Winds t1_j0jsk5s wrote
The commentators compared this to an under-12 C-grade match.
5m1tm t1_j0gzo6w wrote
Lmao absolute shambles
enthusiasticbrunt55 t1_j0jsrkr wrote
That was absolutely ridiculous. A world record lowest score by any professional team in any format. A great job from the bowlers and backed up by some brilliant fielding.
5m1tm t1_j0kd8i9 wrote
This is actually the joint 7th-lowest total in all of professional cricket (if you count the domestic tournaments of each country in all formats since the beginning of professional cricket). All the other lower scores (or equally low scores) were before WW I or something like that. I read this somewhere, so idk how true it is but assuming it is true, this is actually the lowest score in entire professional cricket in the last 100+ years, which is bad enough. Absolutely shit performance lmao.
filthydeference t1_j0iybua wrote
Sydney Blunder?
yellowbin74 t1_j0gqxw3 wrote
Just found it in YouTube- what a mess that was
egowritingcheques t1_j0irn26 wrote
That sums up Sydney perfectly.
FlotsamOfThe4Winds t1_j0jsiuw wrote
Best context: this is their highest-scoring batter's whole innings. (If you think it looked like it shouldn't really have deserved to have done anything... I'm kinda with you on that one.)
Yuzral t1_j0gu0uy wrote
So…immediate retirement and new identities all round, then?
[deleted] t1_j0g8jl7 wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_j0gh1su wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j0gm45u wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j0gbozi wrote
[deleted]
Truthful_Azn t1_j0k0n62 wrote
Sport?
WakeUpMareeple OP t1_j0ki31u wrote
Literally in the title, and the flair.
5m1tm t1_j0khkie wrote
Yes, idiot :)
AccordionORama t1_j0hvd33 wrote
Of all the headlines I don't understand, cricket provides the most amusing.
FlotsamOfThe4Winds t1_j0jvzqf wrote
Why are Americans particularly proud of their ignorance?
transcon2017 t1_j0gjq9v wrote
“I don’t understand the headline and I won’t respond to it.”
~ Lucille Bluth, probably
WakeUpMareeple OP t1_j0gst1c wrote
Does it take a genius level intellect to understand what "lowest score ever" means?
5m1tm t1_j0gngrb wrote
Then why did you respond? Could've just shut up and moved on :)
WakeUpMareeple OP t1_j0g66ge wrote
For some context, this is the equal-seventh lowest score in any format of professional cricket, and the lowest total in 40 years. All other totals equal or worse are from before the First World War.
In the BBL, the competition these teams compete it, the previous lowest score was 57.