Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_j79fflz wrote

1

Green_man619 t1_j79g514 wrote

Not wrong, but wrong to what I said. Oregan made small amounts of possession not a crime. However, only psychedelics are available for sale and distribution and completely decrimed them. What Canada is doing is much different and will make hard drugs available and not only not illegal to possess. So what I said remains true

1

[deleted] t1_j79gk06 wrote

[deleted]

1

Green_man619 t1_j79imsr wrote

Okay well, I misspelled the first one and decrime is shorthand, but I guess you never use shorthand on a day-to-day basis. On the main point, instead of pretentious grammar corrections, by that logic missouri would have legalized weed because they allow sale of it. However, they didn't because they couldn't, but they could completely decriminalize it which is what I'm talking about. Oregan didn't completely decrime hard drugs, obviously, just small amounts. In reference to canada tho, yea they are legalizing it, not decriminalizing it, because they are changing federal law. I suppose since you care about words so much, I could've bypassed both of your worthless comments by simply saying nowhere in america has legalized hard drugs like canada is planning to. Which is true

1