Submitted by MidwestFescue82 t3_yhgkb9 in springfieldMO
GinWithJennifer t1_iug6qk9 wrote
Reply to comment by mrsdex1 in Amendment 3 does NOT infringe on your constitutional rights. At all. by MidwestFescue82
Idek what that means. If it decriminalizes it and regulates it then it sounds good to me
mrsdex1 t1_iug7ugr wrote
No snark, full on prohibition didn't solve points 4, and 5. This language won't either.
Do we really need to continue to learn these lessons?
GinWithJennifer t1_iugc9s1 wrote
I have no idea what you're talking about.
mrsdex1 t1_iugcnsv wrote
Ok, so what do you think points 4 and 5 mean?
GinWithJennifer t1_iugcxkm wrote
Prevent crime and transition society to a safer more regulated product.
I don't use so it will not affect me fortunately. It seems like a liberal policy mostly from what I can tell
mrsdex1 t1_iuggpey wrote
Prohibition was never successful at stopping the legacy market, how do you think this legilstation will move the legacy market towards the regulated market now fully under control of the MO gov't?
The NAACP has said to vote no on this legislation, because they know who will continue to be arrested.
GinWithJennifer t1_iugx0p8 wrote
Thats basically what happened in legal states. It became legal and illicit trade lost a lot of its profit margin. Money is what makes the illegal market function. If the legal market is competitive then they can operate legally. I even watched a podcast by a kingpin that was getting big just as Washington was legalizing. He said the only money in it then was transporting it to states where it was still illegal and after he got out of jail and many more states had legalized he said that was still very much the case in his opinion. That's just one guy I guess but that see s pretty consistent with most states right? The legal businesses replace the illegal ones and a new main stream culture props up and thrives and newer better products emerge.
Decriminalize it and let the market thrive and it probably lead to better for everyone in the very long run. The type of fear mongering you seem to be doing is a lot like people said about Colorado (or maybe I'm confusing it with New Mexico) just before it became the first state to legalize. None of the things people predicted negative came true in Colorado and almost as soon as the state saw this influx of money they changed their tune super fast.
Just let this be the beginning of a better system than what we already have. Isn't it always talked about how the medicinal experiment is just a pathway to recreational? Because people that wanna do it are just gonna do it anyway and medicinal is just the stepping stone t recreational and more positive olicies and stuff can follow.
mrsdex1 t1_iuhcwqt wrote
We gotta stop arresting people for weed. Why is that such a hard concept to grasp.
GinWithJennifer t1_iuhp1ta wrote
That's what I want tho
Esb5415 t1_iuhpoqr wrote
And that is what this amendment does.
GinWithJennifer t1_iuhs4wk wrote
Yall are confusing me
Esb5415 t1_iuhs8jx wrote
What do you have questions about? I'd be happy to try to offer unbiased information about the amendment, with sources.
GinWithJennifer t1_iuhsiv9 wrote
Alright well it sounds like it decriminalizes pot so I'm gonna vote for it
mrsdex1 t1_iuk4n54 wrote
You can't decrim while protecting regulated cannabis profits.
The two concepts are incompatible.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments