After reading and looking over both sides. I'd say no. Being a born Springfield resident and looking through both sides; The side that wants a "yes" vote just want to slap more shit in to profit off of, without giving af to those it would affect. The supporters are almost entirely comprised of white men that own businesses. There's like 2 women in there. The "no" side makes valid safety concerns about flooding and added car traffic that the area cant handle, and whos gonna pay for those additions after they become a problem? Not the people who plan on profiting from the new development. Springfield had some nasty flooding this year, in which I suspect will get worse, let's not make it any worse for something that isnt going to help the rental and housing market for the working class.