Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

sgfjb t1_isufvgq wrote

Yes. More housing options will help the overall local economy and housing issue. Even if the rent is higher, it puts more competition and pressure at existing similar priced units which has ripple effects across the entire market. This is basic supply and demand economics. A bunch of NIMBYs in here. If they fill the units with people paying those higher rents it means more people living, shopping and paying taxes in Springfield.

There is nothing beautiful or historic about the piece of land and development will only enhance the Galloway area despite the neighbors wishes. I am amazed this is so controversial.

1

booksandspooks t1_isvghsc wrote

It significantly changes the view from the park and will have a detrimental effect on the park’s storm water management. I’m not sure how that enhances an area that’s enjoyed by more than just the Galloway neighbors.

2

sgfjb t1_isw0wm3 wrote

People go to Sequiota Park to look that direction? And it’s beautiful now and will be hideous with newer buildings? These arguments are such a stretch. Is there a report or expert that’s spoken on the storm water management? That’s the only legitimate concern I’ve read but it’s only been in pure speculation and conjecture. If there’s meat to it, please share.

0

Comprehensive_Ad6049 t1_isvemkm wrote

Where are the high paying jobs to support it?

1

sgfjb t1_isw16jm wrote

Is that a new requirement that housing must come attached with matching jobs? We have 2% unemployment and a severe lack of housing options. But please let’s keep focusing on only allowing single family homes in our city with no buildable empty lots.

1