any recommendations for a leasing company that will allow for medical marijuana card holders to use weed?

Submitted by Snoo_84090 t3_y7i87q in springfieldMO

At home doesn't allow weed, even with a medical card. Which is a problem since some of my older family who will be moving with me carry medical cards and use medical marijuana to cope with their terminal conditions. Any recommendations for companies that allow medical marijuana? Need to find a place to move soon

5

Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Arc-ansas t1_isvyny4 wrote

Unless you're using massive quantities, no one is probably going to know or care. It's about to be legal recreationally in a few months anyways.

7

Ecualung t1_isw3fmd wrote

Though the proposition may indeed pass, it will probably take quite a long time to be implemented. If it passes in November I wouldn’t expect to see legal recreational weed until 2024. I have no particular source on this, so I’d be happy to be proven wrong.

2

Arc-ansas t1_iswch5d wrote

Right. I'm not sure how long the actual commercial application of the law would be rolled out. But in terms of 21+ adults being protected to possess cannabis, that is applied by Dec 8, 2022. As far as I can tell. Please don't take that as legal advice.

My point was that many folks are going to be more leniant in general. But in terms of accepted use, that may be difficult to find in writing. Even in states like Colorado, a lot of leases still forbid indoor cannabis use in writing. Although most don't enforce that or care.

4

A_Ron_Sacks t1_isxotoh wrote

God I hope not, that amendment is garbage, and will cause more harm than good.

1

Arc-ansas t1_isxstfd wrote

It's a solid law and allows you to possess more cannabis than you can in Colorado. Adults can grow your own, has automatic expungment for past mairjuana convictions, nurses can now certify medical cannabis patients, increases medical cannabis card from one year to three years and more.

3

A_Ron_Sacks t1_isxwb6n wrote

Lets expand on the "More" part. It helps big business lock in a monopoly on the market. It creates new felonies for possession, and puts further limits on home growing to push people to the despos go gain more revenue. I like some thigs about it, but I'll be voting no.

−2

Arc-ansas t1_isy0139 wrote

Current felony cannabis limits in Missouri have anything over 35g (barely over an ounce) of up to 7 years in prison and up to a $10,000 fine. What we'll be voting on allows 21+ to possess up to 3 ounces with no penalties. SO now, it doesn't create a new felony. It lowers the penalties.

The amendment allows a minimum of 144 new business licenses (no maximum). There are already over 100 different cannabis entities in the state. So the idea that this will create a monopoly is silly.

By the way, the folks that are running this campaign are the same folks that passed the medical cannabis law in 2016.

3

phokas t1_it41z7n wrote

You are completely uninformed, but not surprised. There's always tons of misinformation from both sides anytime there's a ballot initiative.

1

notnotpegbundy t1_isy45n2 wrote

Are they unable to partake outside?

1

Snoo_84090 OP t1_isy4t7p wrote

Nope, would have to be on the street, and one of the people who use it medically are bed ridden

1

notnotpegbundy t1_isy54tk wrote

Ah. Yeah, unless they got camera pointed at you there’s no way to prove if you smoke outside, but if they are unable that completely takes that option out of account.

Hm. This is something people do not think of when it comes to legalization. Thank you for bringing this issue to the table, because honestly, I would have never even thought to ask if I was looking to rent.

3