the_honeyman t1_itqj9yj wrote on October 25, 2022 at 3:56 PM

Reply to comment by Low_Tourist in Vote NO on Question #1 by [deleted]

Ok. How would the park be ruined by building apartments across the street from the park?

banjomin t1_itqse1p wrote on October 25, 2022 at 4:56 PM

Because right now there are a bunch of trees around there and that is nicer for the people at the park than a bunch of apartment buildings.

I personally would like to still have some sunshine there after 3pm instead of just being in the shade of an apartment building.

Comprehensive_Ad6049 t1_itqxcuu wrote on October 25, 2022 at 5:27 PM

It will be ruined because the apartments will use the park as their retention pond.

the_honeyman t1_itqy8m0 wrote on October 25, 2022 at 5:33 PM

The developer has no plans for dealing with runoff? That's a legitimate argument, though it seems like a failure on the planning and zoning commission to make them address it if true.

Comprehensive_Ad6049 t1_itrotyj wrote on October 25, 2022 at 8:22 PM

The do have a plan... To use the creek in the park as a natural filter... :*(

the_honeyman t1_itrpdgg wrote on October 25, 2022 at 8:25 PM

Well there you go. This is what the "vote no" crowd should be pushing.

Comprehensive_Ad6049 t1_itrwyjj wrote on October 25, 2022 at 9:14 PM

I agree with you there.