Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Advanced_Car1599 t1_ivr5d70 wrote

Reply to comment by [deleted] in Refused service by [deleted]

Let us know when you find someone to take your case.

7

Quirky_Highlight t1_ivrdles wrote

Refusing to serve available kid's meals to in store customers without an app is immoral and insanely idiotic.

However, I'm not sure there would be enough members of a legally protected class to be worth a lawsuit. Maybe.

0

VaderTower t1_ivtiieq wrote

Yeah it's discrimination, but it's legal discrimination. The same way a business can discriminate against you if you wear hats, wearing hats aren't a protected class, therefore legal for the discrimination.

The only way to change that is to bring suit against the business, unlikely to win, or have state/federal legislation to write in a law.

Both of which have an incredibly low chance of success.

3

Quirky_Highlight t1_ivts3c1 wrote

Yes,, I think I would agree completely.

I don't think that everything that is immoral or stupid should be prosecuted.

That said there are likely localities that would have ordinances they would be in violation of if they are enforcing this nationwide.

I would also point out the fact there are almost certainly corporate shills downvoting good comments on this thread points to a pattern of bullying.

0

VaderTower t1_ivvbjnl wrote

I doubt you have many Chipotle corporate shills in a medium city size subreddit.

That being said, also bullying, not illegal.

2